• rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why tf can’t they sell mac with upgradable parts?? They are “so” into renewable and recycling stuff and saving planet and stuff. Then they should start selling shits with upgradable parts. Even cpu’s if possible. Now apple fan boys argue with that. And don’t bullshit me with soc should be near cpu for faster optimisation they can redesign the mobo.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are legitimate advantages of the RAM being soldered right next to the SoC. However, if anyone could figure out how to create a proprietary RAM module, that slots in right next to the SoC (or even just an SoC module including RAM) that can be swapped out and that doesn‘t have any meaningful performance impact, it would be Apple. Just that it never could be Apple…

      • natebluehooves@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The problem is the electrical resistance of the socket. Most of the performance on apple silicon is achieved through extremely high bandwidth, low latency memory. Unfortunately that necessitates a socketless design at the moment, and you can see that happening on the snapdragon X too.

        • accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yea, not just snapdragon and apple. Even intel and amd processors usually get paired with higher bandwidth soldered ram on many mobile offerings.

          And on GPUs soldered VRAM has been a thing for a loooong time, with HBM memory being the prime example for what RAM close to the chip can do. AMD‘s Vega cards were highly sought after during the mining craze, even though they weren’t that fast in general computing, simply because their memory bandwidth was so beyond any other consumer cards…

    • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because that gives the user as much or more control over the device as Apple themselves have. One of the fairly consistent things about Apple over the years has been a desire to maintain tight control for themselves over the products they make.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is what they say they are in favor of, and there is what they really are in favor of.

      They are in favor of apple getting all the monies, the end

    • Caiman86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      They certainly used to. My wife’s 2012 MacBook Pro has upgraded RAM and SSD parts I’ve put in over the years and still runs fine, though it isn’t used much anymore and OS upgrades stopped a while ago.

      Their current environmental marketing is pure greenwashing bullshit and their stances on upgradability and repairability are terrible.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s basically just greenwashing. They pretend to be into renewables and recycling only when it doesn’t disincentivize people from buying the newest product. Ex: iPhone trade in for recycling - Yes, they do recover some raw material but you can only do it if you’re buying a new iPhone with that credit, and its probably also an attempt to keep cheap used iPhones off of the market.