• ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fallen. Denzel sets a very neat trap for the demon… but not neat enough.

    Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog as well. While the Doc may have been mostly noble and Hammer mostly awful, it ends (somewhat ambiguously) with the Doc actually turning into a villain.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess my mind automatically excluded it because of the demon aspect being somewhat horror related (though it’s a completely mild movie in terms of graphic violence) but it definitely deserves to be on this list. Partner watched it for the first time few months back and loved it (they hate horror and generally prefer family genre), just a generally great movie that keeps you intrigued and was a great change from stream-binging style entertainment.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Usual Suspects is the first one that comes to mind that isn’t horror and the villain winning by getting away. Does that fit the ‘evil wins’ concept you are looking for?

      • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        None of the thieves got away at the end of Reservoir Dogs.

        This is not to say that “good” triumphed at the end either.

          • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s pretty clear to me given the cops shooting, then shouting orders, and Mr. Pink saying he’s been shot, that he does not in fact get away.

            I know there’s theories on the Internet about this, and he may not have died, but at the very least he’s been caught and does not keep the diamonds.

  • Shurimal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pretty much any Batman movie. It’s subtle, because it’s not chaotic evil, but lawful evil—the status quo, established hierarchic power structures and systemic injustices that plague the city remain in place. In fact, enforcing and protecting status quo is the whole raison d’entre of Batman, who is an extremely priviledged rich individual benefitting and profiting from the status quo. And thus has no desire to enact real societal change, unlike eg Baine.

    I’d argue James Bond is also the same. Yes, Bond villains are evil—irrationally and comically so—but like Batman, Bond represents, enforces and protects the same hierarchic power structures and systemic injustices that give rise to these villains.

    Then there is Star Wars and all this light vs dark side. But if you stop and think about it, Sith and Jedi are just two sides of the same medal. Jedi mind trick that coerces someone to do something against their will is extremely evil by its very concept. Especially in how trivialized its use is in the movies. Also, there is nothing civilized about lightsabers. These are horribly dangerous to the wielder and their opponent alike, will easily cut through hull plating by accident (a bad thing when a cm of material is all that’s standing between you and hard vacuum). And would in reality not make a clean cauterized cut, but explosively flash boil the target with the end result like being blown from a cannon.

    Lawful, systemic evil is the most devilish kind of evil; it’s so subtle it goes unnoticed and is even celebrated as good, no doubt in no small part due to the vast propaganda machine lawful evil loves to build up around itself.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      To add to the star wars situation, the jedi are just as bad for the force as the sith, if not worse. They enforce a rigorous dogma that forces their own to suppress all emotion from a young age out of fear that they may be corrupted by the dark side. Not only does this literally make Darth Vader, but it leads to an entire society of emotionally stunted psychics who apparently go rogue very often. They’re not sustainable.

      Ignoring the new movies because I genuinely can’t figure out what they’re about, Anakin fulfilled the prophecy at the end of the original 3, destroying the incredibly powerful dogmatic regime of the jedi and killing both master and pupil of the sith leaving only independent, self governed force users dotting the galaxy.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Jedi: We teach restraint to powerful individuals to keep the universe in harmony. This means defending the weak, and often preserving the status quo.

        Sith: We teach powerful individuals to fuck shit up, including each other, just because they can. This means culling the weak, and shaking up the status quo.

        StarWars Leftists: Jedi are protecting the peace, the council is righteous!
        StarWars Libs: Sith are changing the status quo! They’re anti corruption!
        StarWars Centrists: These two are virtually the same!

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        No, they aren’t.

        Why the hell don’t Star Wars fans understand Star Wars, it’s not that deep and even when they go looking they splash around in the shallow end of the pool

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In The Company Of Men

    Devil’s Advocate

    Interview With The Vampire

    Se7en

    Nightcrawler

    American Psycho

    Arguably No Country For Old Men

    A lot of documentaries e.g: Paradise Lost.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Devil’s Advocate

      I’d say evil loses quite definitively in that one - although the final minute or so makes it clear the contest of wills isn’t over.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The reason why I think it wins is it becomes obvious Satan can have do-overs and he’s already falling for one of them. He hasn’t actually escaped, and Satan is still having fun at his expense.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          All while killing nearly 15 million civilians and undesirables, after being allied to the Nazis and invading Poland and then only going against the Nazis when they kept invading.

          The Soviet’s were happy to carve up Europe with the Nazis.

          The soviets didn’t win it single handedly by any measure, but funny joke and all.

          The Soviets weren’t the good guys, they just happened to be double fucked by their bad guy ally.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Nazis certainly were evil at their core and may be an outlier. War though? It’s difficult to not call war and it’s atrocities evil. Even if you can prove irrefutably that you are on the “good side”, two barracks down, the next town over, a 1000ft overhead something evil could be taking place specifically because war exists, and what’s evil hides easiest in chaos and death.

        Conflict happens. To the single soldier. The lonely wife. The stricken Mother and Father. War rarely has a true meaning. “Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask the ghosts if honor matters. The silence is your answer” Javik (Mass Effect)

        People tend to defend war because of their agreement or disagreement over the reason for a conflict. While there is often a morally right side and wrong side, all I really see are the lives lost.

  • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    A Scanner Darkly, the drug epidemic is controlled by the pharmaceutical companies and they are still rich at the end.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago
      spoiler

      But the movie ends with the brainfried undercover cop picking a drug-producing flower to send to his friends as a gift. It’s implied that’s what they need to bring the drug empire down.

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s implied that it could go either way, but the ending it has ended before that could be decided. Also that undercover cop burned out his brain for a cause he never really signed up for.

  • Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am going to put in little shop of horrors since it is a musical. And I really would not consider it horror.

    For those of you that don’t know there are actually 2 versions of this movie. The original release version where the plants lose and the ORIGINAL test audience version where the plants win.

    • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Globo Gym wins in the original version of Dodgeball, but the test audiences hated it so they added the blindfolded stand-off. I’m mostly happy they changed it, but that original ending would have been so ballsy. Also would make the subtitle better, since most “true” underdogs do lose.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      The director insists the alien plants winning was the original ending he wanted, but he was forced to give the film a happy ending at the last minute. The director’s cut gives you the original ending in all it’s evil glory.

      There’s also an original Little Shop of Horrors released in 1960 that stars a young Jack Nicholson. That film has a different ending than both endings of the 1986 remake.

    • Davel23@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      The original ending was included on one of the recent home video releases. If you like the movie and haven’t seen it yet, you really need to.

  • anton2492@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’ve got one that’s a gem and hasn’t been mentioned yet, for once!

    Upgrade (2018)

    A guy and his wife are attacked, his wife is murdered and he just barely survives. With the help of a super-chip implanted into his body by a billionaire, he sets out to get revenge. But at what cost?

    A stylish, savage techno-action film, basically John Wick but with AI chip. The ending is rightly haunting. Well worth watching!

      • anton2492@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Without spoiling too much, the ending is not entirely traumatising in my view, but it personally left me rather depressed, with an acute feeling of loss and hopelessness. Though wouldn’t say that any standard trigger/content warnings apply to the ending (the rest of the movie does get rather bloody though)

  • Red_sun_in_the_sky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    There will be blood. Oil mogul thrives while america plunges into depression. Plainview and people like him will go on to be more influential down the line. Like prescott bush or hw bush.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    Willy Wonka (Or Charlie) and the Chocolate Factory. And not because of Charlie, but because of Wonka.

    The dude’s basically a slave owner, paying his workers in cocoa beans, he nearly drowns a kid, poisons another, throws a third into an incinerator, and disfigures a fourth.

    He’s not a good person.