• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yea, increasingly it seems ActivityPub and this fediverse is just a prototype. It’s quite realistic that in 10 years we won’t be looking back on it with huge amounts of praise, apart from proving that this general model can work, which is huge.

    I do wonder though, how would moderation work in true decentralisation. Who owns the community should the instance of its creator goes down? I guess user accounts would also be decentralised.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yup. I’m messing around with decentralized services (e.g. IPFS and Iroh), and I think it would be really cool to have a completely decentralized service like lemmy. Some issues:

      • content would be immutable, so there would be no way to truly delete anything deterministically (would be up to clients)
      • following from the first, moderation would be an opt-in thing, so clients would need to enforce moderation changes themselves
      • performance would probably suck until the network gets bigger, so early adopters would have a rough time of it
      • searching could be complicated to implement, I need to think more about it

      I think it should be possible to implement the Lemmy API and just use IPFS/Iroh as a storage backend to get started, and slowly push the server bits to the client as the userbase gets bigger.