Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3年前Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1758cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@derp.fooprogramming@programming.devmain@rblind.comwebdev@programming.dev
arrow-up1758external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3年前message-square97fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@derp.fooprogramming@programming.devmain@rblind.comwebdev@programming.dev
minus-squaredarkkite@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3年前legally yes they’ve been fined by numerous governments for excessive privacy violations
minus-squarejoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3年前That’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?
legally yes they’ve been fined by numerous governments for excessive privacy violations
That’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?