• blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    and subsidize their industries indefinitely

    People keep saying this that are fully aware the US subsidizes its industries too. Yeah? They subsidize their electric vehicles? Fuckin good!

    • profdc9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think whataboutism ever helps anything. American subsidies and bailouts has not resulted in better consumer choice. However, choosing options that are due to dumping isn’t going to produce sustainable industry either in China after the subsidies there end. The only real solution is to actually make practical electric vehicles at an affordable price.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Its resulted in lower prices for the industries subsidized.

        I have no idea what you mean by dumping and unsustainable. Why would the subsidies end?

        The only real solution is to actually make practical electric vehicles at an affordable price.

        Do you realize youre arguing against a method to achieve more affordable prices?

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think he is stating that by subsidizing Chinese vehicles way below what could be practical to sell subsided non-Chinese vehicles at China can effectively kill off the non-Chinese automotive manufacturing capacity over enough time. Once this has been achieved China can increase prices drastically as Americans would no longer have domestic car options to buy, and creating a monopoly.

          • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Just like how people can no longer afford low end manufactured goods because China massively increased the prices once they took over that market, right?

            • FireTower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes but the alternative is not having to spend tons of money to subsidize private industry and not letting China profit off of American auto sales.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Its a worse alternative for the environment, we should both be investing in electric vehicles. Bullshit mindset when we could be having more affordable green technology and all people are thinking of is the economy. Fuck American auto sales, we dont need more gas guzzling SUVs in the world.

                • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Honestly I’d that the lives saved from transitioning to EVs quicker is worth the trade. Eventually the car manufacturers will have to compete even if it means they stop making huge cars no one needs and start making smaller ones that travel further. I’m not going to pretend us manufacturers don’t abuse the fuck out of Mexico, India, and China when it comes to sourcing parts and labor, but the environment is a global win we desperately need.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Considering we’re deficit spending with every budget cycle, I’d say no we don’t have the money. Furthermore, what about all the other brands sold in the US besides the three American ones of GM, Ford, and Tesla?

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I didn’t say it was. Deficit spending to build a highway that winds up generating a bunch of extra revenue is one thing. Deficit spending to make a singular product cheaper than another country who is doing the same is a losing game.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Considering we’re deficit spending with every budget cycle

                So is china, and at a higher rate than we are.

                what about all the other brands sold in the US besides the three American ones of GM, Ford, and Tesla?

                What about em?

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  How do they compete if the US subsidizes US companies and China subsidizes Chinese companies? Have you even thought through your proposal here? It certainly doesn’t sound like it. Waving your hand around and thinking money appears out of nowhere seems to be the limit of your analysis.

                  • blazera@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    How do they compete if the US subsidizes US companies and China subsidizes Chinese companies?

                    Why would i care?

                    Waving your hand around and thinking money appears out of nowhere seems to be the limit of your analysis.

                    Are you imagining money just disappearing once its spent on subsidies? US has been spending hundreds of billions of dollars every year for decades on defense yet somehow we havent run out of money to spend. Learn how countries finance things.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The military and government contacts alone will keep the big 3 in business. They’re in no danger of a mom and pop Walmart situation.