• YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s true though. They’re not nazis. They’re incapable of being fired by any fundamentally political or spiritual ideals, no matter how ultimately black and nihilistic, at all. Even if these people were full-throated card-carrying members of the American Nazi party marching through Times Square with a swastika flag throwing out copies of Der Sturmer from a Panzer tank they wouldn’t be nazis. The fact is that they’re just the purest distillation of 20th-21st century media culture yet: they’re so utterly saturated in media that the only choice they’ve made, the only choice available to them, was whether to lean into the goodie or the baddie vibe, and they plumped for “baddie” because it suited their contrarian aesthetic and then, without even leaving a ripple on the surface, they slipped into the role and inhabited it so thoroughly that it is, literally, indistinguishable from who they are.

    These people are nothing less, and 100% nothing more, than your childish glee at getting to play the villain in an RPG.

    • sc_griffith@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      6 months ago

      Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed. That word is “Nazi.”

      • YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m saying this goes further!

        Actually I feel kind of irked that this reply seems to just miss the part at the end of the paragraph that says “it is, literally, indistinguishable from who they are”

        • sc_griffith@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          6 months ago

          I didn’t miss it. I just don’t see any need to be elaborate about the word nazi, although I do appreciate what a crushingly insulting description of them you gave

          • YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Scholars of fascism and nazism do it all the time! The target of quotes like that is supposed to be those who deliberately muddy the waters. The “call a nazi a nazi” principle is a blunt instrument, and there are other tools in the anti-nazi kit.

            [some hours later…] ah, the quote is from AR Moxon, whom I happen to know is both (a) not remotely averse to going deeper on what makes the nazis, (b) distinctly averse to not going deeper

          • corbin@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Paraphrasing Santayana, we must understand why people become fascist, or else we will not understand how to prevent ourselves from making the same mistakes of dehumanization and black-and-white reasoning which characterize their piss-poor attempts at logic.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      These people are nothing less, and 100% nothing more, than your childish glee at getting to play the villain in an RPG.

      I’m pretty certain I get more glee from my RP than they ever experienced in their lives.

    • self@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      ok so this is driving me crazy

      am I weird for thinking the circle of candles in the fireplace (in a house that’s allegedly unbearably cold) is weird?

      • deborah@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s weird, but it’s normal weird. It’s the kind of thing you see in design magazines and pinterest and the spruce. I don’t know if actual rich people do it but it’s definitely fairly normal middlebrow home decor.

        (A lot of fireplaces in older US buildings are vestigial, often blocked up, and are inefficient at heating.)

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          it’s also definitely the sort of shit you see in some midmarket airbnb’s (because it’s in design/pinterest/etc magazines)

        • deborah@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          The prose on that The Spruce link makes me hate the concepts of design, aesthetics, and houses.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Reaching through my screen into this photo so I can pull out the rifle and shoot myself

      Who thought it would be a good idea to keep that in a household with 3 kids under 5. Is it just so they can flash it at Republicans and win primary votes??

  • deborah@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 months ago

    three consecutive youtube thumbnails, dated 11, 9, and 4 years ago, showing simone’s transition from having fun with a channel woman in a cute fascinator to hugo boss chic

    Gee, I wonder what about the time period from 2015 to 2020 would have prompted the transformation from “occasional youtuber who goofily wears fascinators and cute nerdy graphic tees” to “hugo boss chic”. Must have just been her own changing tastes, couldn’t possibly be related to anything else.

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The video title “A Pragmatist’s Take on Small Talk” would be much better if it were William James giving advice on navigating the social niceties. Step 1: this hat.

    • jonhendry@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The middle picture looks very much like a young lesbian couple.

      Not that there’s anything wrong with lesbian couples of any age. It’s just with this pair it’s… odd.

      I can’t help it. I see a picture of them and it’s like a puzzle I need to solve.

      • o7___o7@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Where are the bed sheets?

        Also, where are the family photos? Framed art? Kid drawings?

        Edit: Cobra Commander and the Baroness at home in a GI-Joe movie directed by Michael Bay circa 2008.

        Edit2: Evil Sean Astin

        Edit3: I’ve never seen a three-piece suit with dungarees. It’s the mullet of suits: business on the top, party on the bottom.

        I’m sorry, I’m being awfully mean and petty on the internet today.

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 months ago

          the kids have to thunderdome it out for recognition, and then they have to pay for the photos with their own money that they earned in their weekend jobs (you know, the ones they get to do after their homejobs all week). just like in a perfectly normal family!

        • carlitoscohones@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Edit3: I’ve never seen a three-piece suit with dungarees. It’s the mullet of suits: business on the top, party on the bottom.

          I came here the other day to post this. Just bizarre.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Two self described Neo-Alt-Conservatives who claim that white people need to populate more rather than allow immigrants from Africa.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          ???

          They’re pieces of shit regardless of which words I didn’t call them. You think my informing you of their racist ideology was an endorsement or something? Careful with those mental gymnastics, you’ll hurt yourself.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            “self-described” without a description of your own, “neo-alt-conservatives” with no/floating definition, and “who claim” without counter

            you literally just made a loose collection of statements, in what could plausibly be interpreted (and then expounded on) in a completely new/different way entirely depending on how your message was received. and if you did even the slightest bit of fucking reading you wouldn’t even be trying to claim that you’re informing me of anything. but thanks for trying

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              If you needed me to tell you they were bad people after telling you what they believe, then you’re not really worth the energy to be perfectly frank. They are literally racial supremacists trying to fuck the planet over by supporting population growth in a time of widespread inequality and war. You don’t need me to go through the thesaurus of insults to understand how bad they are. You’re an adult, you should be able to piece this grand puzzle together on your own.

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              like literally whether you meant to or not, you made an extremely swing-able post, and that’s all I’m calling you out on

  • Architeuthis@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    There’s an actual explanation in the original article about some of the wardrobe choices. It’s even dumber, and it involves effective altruism.

    It is a very cold home. It’s early March, and within 20 minutes of being here the tips of some of my fingers have turned white. This, they explain, is part of living their values: as effective altruists, they give everything they can spare to charity (their charities). “Any pointless indulgence, like heating the house in the winter, we try to avoid if we can find other solutions,” says Malcolm. This explains Simone’s clothing: her normal winterwear is cheap, high-quality snowsuits she buys online from Russia, but she can’t fit into them now, so she’s currently dressing in the clothes pregnant women wore in a time before central heating: a drawstring-necked chemise on top of warm underlayers, a thick black apron, and a modified corset she found on Etsy. She assures me she is not a tradwife. “I’m not dressing trad now because we’re into trad, because before I was dressing like a Russian Bond villain. We do what’s practical.”

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    from bsky

    unfortunately had to slap my youngest child, hyperion dipshit, in the target parking lot today after he failed to show proper respect to a cybertruck. before you call that abuse, just ask my other children, aryan chlamydia and maximus trifecta what they think

    confiscating Adeptus Mechanus’s iPad to teach him a lesson about makers and takers

    cursed subskeet is what we plan to name our fourth child

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    The biggest issue with these people is they use “reason and logic” to arrive at their belief, but literally fail to connect dots because of their removal from reality.

    the problem is most acute in countries that are “technophilic, pluralistic, educated, where women have rights”.

    It’s not because women have rights though. It’s because rich fucks like his mentor Musk absorbs the majority of prosperity in nations. If there’s no hope, there’s no reason to continue.

    The only places where the birthrate is not falling to unsustainable levels are countries where the average citizen earns less than $5,000 (£4,000) a year

    And this isn’t even true. Places like India, even the poorest of the poor regions, are seeing their population boom quickly decline. So while technically they haven’t hit negative values, they’re already moving in that direction.

    Whenever you hit max value for a resource, you’ve hit peak that resource, and humanity has hit peak humanity in terms of how the various governments and economic systems view value in their fellow mankind. Economic systems have no additional value to give (or value that they WANT to give) to human beings. There’s just no additional investment going into that resource. We’ve hit peak humanity in an economic sense, so there’s just zero reason for something to grow if nothing is being invested into it.

    This would be clear to this couple if their heads weren’t so far up their asses.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not a mention in the article of the impact of pollution on fertility, which isn’t inconsiderable.

      Two factors that have made the birth rate go down are a) greater access to contraception and abortion for women and b) reduced numbers of teenage pregnancies. Of course forced births and forced labour are a-ok with these two.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Meh, personally I think pollution impacts on fertility might be overblown. Not in any way negligible, just overrated.

        For example, microplastics are being found everywhere now but widespread plastic use was about 1/6th the current levels over 40 years ago so you would expect it to have been an issue going back decades. Methane emissions also cause birth defects and loss of fertility, but states with refineries and flare stacks also have higher rates of teen mothers (unintuitive correlation of conservative policies).

        On the other hand, the fastest growing populations are places such as the middle east with low to nonexistent women’s rights, while the slowest growing are places with women in positions of power and education. In 1994 in Cairo the United Nations came up with a plan to curb poverty and starvation in the region by limiting population growth by… checks notes* educating women.

        That all said: Population Decline is a good thing. It should decline. 200 years ago we had a billion people, and we had flourishing arts and sciences and engineering marvels such as the London Underground, typewriters, trains and canals across continents, the first Soda Fountain. Less people doesn’t hinder humanity in any feasible way. More people is going to kill this planet.

        Sorry for the rant.

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      as well as boot nazis and tie nazis, I propose a third classification: horrible locker-friendly dweebs like this