Porn sites must have government health warning in Texas from September 1st::Just when we didn’t think the state of Texas could get any more wacko on tech policy, this latest bill really suggests otherwise. House Bill 1181 is an age verification measure that is similar to what we’ve seen in the state legislatures across other red U.S. states. You have an age verification proposal that is similar…

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Porn is just not naked humans. It’s not like art. And the behavior in those movies rubs off on teenage guys, so they start to behave like in the movies.

    I mean, I still think adding health warning is stupid, but at the same time, we can’t pretend porn doesn’t influence people.

    • lingh0e@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The behavior of the actors in porn does not “rub off on” (lol) on the viewer any more than violent movies rub off on the viewer.

      I’d be more concerned about the guys watching the assholes on YouTube making videos about how to be an “alpha male”.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are actually wrong about that. Do some web searches on it and you will see.

        • lingh0e@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not how it works. If you are making the claim, it’s your responsibility to back that claim up with supporting information.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            IMO it’s everyone’s responsibility to themselves to challenge and research things that they want to know the truth about. If the other poster is correct but has no desire to follow up with it, they will still be correct.

            The burden of proof is on those who want to know the truth. Unless it’s in a court of law, though even there, IMO the adversarial system is outdated and if someone is innocent, the prosecution and police should be working to determine that, not just trying to prove guilt at all costs.

            • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The burden of proof is on those who want to know the truth

              The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. No exceptions.

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s an internet conversion, there’s no burden on anyone unless they have a goal. Wanting to convince others puts the burden on the one making the claim, but if they aren’t interested in putting that much effort into it, that doesn’t invalidate the claim, which talking about the burden of proof being on anyone else is trying to do.

                Even if someone does make the effort to prove something, if knowing the truth is important to you, you should look at other perspectives.

                • 1984@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  This is exactly how I think about things also. Which is why I dropped this conversation. But it’s a fact that porn changes the perception of sex to a huge degree. But young guys don’t even see it because they don’t have any previous experience without porn to compare to.

                  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I shouldn’t have bothered engaging, but that line just annoys me. It’s just a smarter sounding “nuh-uh!”. A better way to go about it IMO would be to ask something like, “what makes you think that?”