Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real

www.theverge.com

external-link
message-square
34
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
  • hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
  • technology@lemmit.online
419
external-link

Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real

www.theverge.com

misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
34
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
  • hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
  • technology@lemmit.online
The confirmation comes after Google refused to comment.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s really sort of amazing how few years it took to go from “Do no evil” to “Don’t even bother pretending not to.”

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get this is the go-to response now, for good reason, but there isn’t really anything too shady going on with this particular case at least not from Google. This is more about them trying to keep SEOs from figuring out how they rank things so they can’t pollute the search results even more.

      Every comment is shitting on Google but here is the what the SEO expert said about the leak when it was presented to them:

      This person’s sole aim appeared quite aligned with my own: to hold Google accountable for public statements that conflict with private conversations and leaked documentation, and to bring greater transparency to the field of search marketing. And they believed that, despite my years removed from SEO, I was the best person to share this publicly.

      https://sparktoro.com/blog/an-anonymous-source-shared-thousands-of-leaked-google-search-api-documents-with-me-everyone-in-seo-should-see-them/

      Just read through that blog. Look at the absolute indignity these SEO assholes have at the idea that the search engine wouldn’t tell them exactly how to fuck it up with their garbage.

      This is entirely about advertising. Hell, the leaker revealed their identity, and it’s the guy that runs this company:

      https://eaeagledigital.com/

      Companies like this and the assholes behind them are a cancer on the internet and they have been for a very long time. You cannot point the finger at Google and not also point the finger at them, they are the other half of the shit equation.

      • SquirrelX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Next to upvoting, I’m just writing this to potentially get your comment ranked higher for this post.

        • Jivebunny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stuffing this comment with keywords in order to rank his comment higher. Upvoting, writing, ranking.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I just noted on another response, mostly it was that I came up with a delicious turn of phrase and couldn’t not post it. And yes, while broadly I think that Google deserves every bit of shit that’s thrown their way and more - that they could vanish from the face of the Earth tomorrow and the internet could only benefit - this particular incident really isn’t a good example.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh FFS. Hadn’t realized that implication yet. I fucking hate SEO internet polluters.

        I suppose on the bright side maybe, between this and the garbage showing from their AI search, they’ll actually dedicate the necessary resources to make their search usable.

    • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forgive me for not reading all 2500 documents, but I haven’t heard anything to suggest there was a bunch of sinister stuff in there – and there’s nothing implicitly evil about having docs leaked.

      • juicy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The main takeaway is that Google uses Chrome to collect data on what search results people click on and how long they spend on those pages. They then use that data to rank search results.

        • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah, I see. That makes sense, but to be fair I think that was expected. I suspect they also pull the same data from every page where adsense is embedded regardless of browser, e.g., and every other company out there is aggregating the same sort of data every possible place they can get it from (shared sign ins, etc etc)

          Edit: It’s definitely a particularly bad look when there are several things in there that representatives for Google have apparently lied about over the years.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have to admit that I was so pleased with that turn of phrase when it came to me that I went ahead and posted it in spite of the fact that this specific incident doesn’t appear to be a good example.

        • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That feels remarkably intellectually honest. I doubt if I would have replied again in that case, so I don’t know why anyone was downvoting this

  • pop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now it would be bloody awesome if someone would leak how their data collection in Android works and how much of their privacy policy is actually not just for good PR.

  • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    • EarJava@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thousands of documents, which appear to come from Google’s internal Content API Warehouse, were released March 13 on Github by an automated bot called yoshi-code-bot.

      • MashedTech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        God, I hate GitHub. It always gets stuck when there are many changes

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          t?

          • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            t!

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ot!

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fr, just like when those game source codes leak or whatever. It’s cool and people want to download it just because, just link them lmao

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were leaked specifically to “SEO experts” who shared portions of it. I don’t know if it was leaked publicly.

      I’m basically what happened is the leaker is an SEO guy, that runs an SEO company, and leaked the documents to another SEO guy.

    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wonder if any are on Internet archive, and perhaps that’s why the ddos

      • DUMBASS@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hidden way back behind a machine.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’d not where they’ve been primarily located, no.

    • Faresh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://hexdocs.pm/google_api_content_warehouse/0.4.0/api-reference.html

      • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could I get a google docs link?

    • mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      RemindMe! 12h

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        There actually is a bot here for that

        @RemindMe@programming.dev 12 hours

      • Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oye reminding you after 12hrs

        • mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks!

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    A collection of 2,500 leaked internal documents from Google filled with details about data the company collects is authentic, the company confirmed today. Until now, Google had refused to comment on the materials.

    The documents in question detail data that Google is keeping track of, some of which may be used in its closely guarded search ranking algorithm. The documents offer an unprecedented — though still murky — look under the hood of one of the most consequential systems shaping the web

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look, at this point Google could just drown puppies on live stream and it won’t matter. They’ll just keep on Googling anyway.

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has anyone gone through the documents? Any interesting findings? Is it time to create a website?

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      This one https://ipullrank.com/google-algo-leak

      And this

      https://sparktoro.com/blog/an-anonymous-source-shared-thousands-of-leaked-google-search-api-documents-with-me-everyone-in-seo-should-see-them/

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    thank GOD the trump news broke or else this would’ve been major

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 22 users / day
  • 47 users / week
  • 81 users / month
  • 30.8K users / 6 months
  • 348 local subscribers
  • 72.2K subscribers
  • 15.3K Posts
  • 621K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org