Patrick Breyer and Pirate Party lose EU Parliament seats - Stack Diary
stackdiary.com
In the wake of the recent European Parliament elections, the Pirate Party has lost its representation in the legislative body. This outcome was confirmed by Patrick Breyer, a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) and a prominent figure within the Pirate Party. Breyer, known for his staunch opposition to chat control measures, expressed deep concern over the implications of this

Patrick Breyer, a staunch defender of digital rights, laments the Pirate Party’s exit from the EU Parliament as a blow to online privacy.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
    91·
    6 months ago

    Quick reminder that in a liberal democracy, social movements are more important for progressive change than electoralism.

    Join a union. Be it trade union, housing union, or whatever (or even any affinity group). And get active.

    Complaining about election results achieves nothing, but sow despair.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      37·
      6 months ago

      Also: voting is important because it lets you choose your enemy. Progressive liberals and social democrats won’t fight against you as hard as conservatives and fascists.

      Putting this here because some people might read this and think “Voting doesn’t matter.”

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
        11·
        6 months ago

        Voting doesn’t really matter, though.

        Edit, clarification: at least compared to bottom-up social movements.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.worldEnglish
          14·
          6 months ago

          It absolutely does though. You can’t elect worker ownership of the means of production but you sure can elect anything from fascists to social democrats. I for one don’t want fascists to control my government

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
            3·
            6 months ago

            If progressive policies were ever put into place by an elected body, it was always merely a by-product of already established social consensus formed by bottom-up politics.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.worldEnglish
              6·
              6 months ago

              I fully agree. But people get better things. Not voting means they don’t. Not voting means the people who want worse things get what they want

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
                2·
                6 months ago

                With electoralism, people get complacent with watered down reforms and become politically alienated.

        • klisklas@feddit.deEnglish
          1·
          6 months ago

          If it doesn’t matter, why are so many people afraid when the right wing parties take control? If it’s not important why are people so concerned about the supreme Court? Why are women so scared of anti abortion legislation? You vote the legislative and they can simply take the power away from your social movements. So in the end, it does matter.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
            2·
            6 months ago

            Voting should not be the main strategy to fight for liberty and progressive change, since the cards in electoralism are way too stacked in favour of the already powerful minority. That’s what I meant with “voting is not important”.

            When Trump lost the last election, MAGA-heads were ready to take up arms against what they considered an injustice. Why aren’t progressives ready to do so? How does the “vote blue no matter who” crowd prepare against another Jan 6th situation?

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      “Progressive” change will only take you further away from liberal democracy and free society.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
        5·
        6 months ago

        surpassing liberal democracy is a good thing. I disagree with the free society bit. What definition of “free society” are you referring to?

      • GiddyGap@lemm.eeEnglish
        3·
        6 months ago

        I’d argue that a progressive country like Denmark with its universal healthcare and universally available college-level education is substantially more free than a freedom-touting country like the United States that limits access to these basics to those with substantial resources.