The ban was imposed by the Trump administration after the accessory was used during the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas.
  • catloaf@lemm.eeEnglish
    7·
    2 年前

    Right. And because Congress hasn’t prohibited them, they’re fair game.

    I was talking more about the general principle of what is allowed versus prohibited than this specific case, though.

    • derf82@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      2 年前

      My point is, they did not rule a ban unconstitutional, since they asked where it was in the constitution.

      • catloaf@lemm.eeEnglish
        4·
        2 年前

        I read it as asking where in the Constitution there is a right to bump stocks. Did you read as asking where the ban is?

        • derf82@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          2 年前

          And there is no constitutional right to bump stocks. They just ruled there is no current law against it. If there was a constitutional right to them, you couldn’t ban them even with a law.

          I didn’t say he was asking where the ban is.