(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 5 months agoGNU-Linuxlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square243fedilinkarrow-up11.75K
arrow-up11.75KimageGNU-Linuxlemmy.blahaj.zone(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square243fedilink
minus-squareschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agothe thing is that not all of them use systemd or bash or zsh or even X11 (servers don’t usually have X11 installed) All of them use a Linux kernel and many components that were originally developed for GNU, especially the C library.
minus-squareEufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 months agoYes, I listed sysvinit for that reason. And Musl instead of glibc. GNU is optional in a Linux distro, except for the kernel’s use of a GNU license.
minus-squareEufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoExcept Alpine & those based on it, which uses Linux but not GNU libc or GNU coreutils or GNU BASH… Just musl libc & Busybox. I.e. the entire subject of this thread is one of the non-GNU Linuxes.
the thing is that not all of them use systemd or bash or zsh or even X11 (servers don’t usually have X11 installed)
All of them use a Linux kernel and many components that were originally developed for GNU, especially the C library.
Yes, I listed sysvinit for that reason. And Musl instead of glibc. GNU is optional in a Linux distro, except for the kernel’s use of a GNU license.
Except Alpine & those based on it, which uses Linux but not GNU libc or GNU coreutils or GNU BASH… Just musl libc & Busybox. I.e. the entire subject of this thread is one of the non-GNU Linuxes.