• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 months ago

    Its a microblogging platform like mastodon and no, we don’t need it in the fediverse. There’s exactly one explanation for why they would want to join.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not trying to be argumentative, but can’t Meta and governments already scrape everyone’s RSS feed in the Fediverse? It’s open; that’s the point.

        • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          That is my point. What isn’t necessarily obvious, though, is that the scrapable data is more comprehensive than what could be scraped on traditional platforms

          • niartenyaw@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            it may be more comprehensive than trying to scrape other platforms, but the data that is available is absolutely nothing compared to what they collect on their own platforms. they’re almost certainly not very concerned with collecting our relatively mild amount of data.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s not about collecting data, the fediverse freely shares all its data by nature.

        Threads has a lot more users and Meta would use that to attack smaller instances, a bit like what Lemmy world was doing a few months ago.

        The biggest instances usually have the most communities and if they ban other instances, rival members are more likely to migrate over than to create copy cat communities.

        It’s not terrible at the moment but bringing in threads is like throwing a shark in a shrimp tank.