• Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dark Arc is saying that it is generally considered a bad thing, contrary to the comic which is implying that it is generally considered good or neutral when it should be considered bad.

        • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          5 months ago

          you guys missed the point. neither should be bad. it’s only bad because of how we sexualize eveything. it’s the sexualization that’s bad, and honestly, that wouldn’t even be that bad if it weren’t for the patriarchal exploitation of sex.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            5 months ago

            Shouldn’t both be bad? Stop sharing naked photos of people who can’t give you consent to do so.

            • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              29
              ·
              5 months ago

              there is nothing inherently wrong with our naked bodies. society has conditioned us to have shame. once upon a time, being naked was normal.

              • Zoot@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah I’d still rather people not show off photos of me without them asking. Its okay to have privacy.

                • jaybone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  This has now gone to: sharing baby pictures is a privacy violation because the baby can’t give consent.

                  Lot of very special people in this thread on Lemmy today.

                  • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    I haven’t been able to peg Lemmy down even after a year and this thread hasn’t helped. Lemmy is pro-freedom, acceptance, and FOSS, is literal to the point of absurdity, has a selectively activated superiority complex, and averages ~17 years old. Knowing all of that, I’m still endlessly befuddled. Any chance you’ve got the last puzzle piece?

                  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    sharing naked with their genitals exposed baby pictures is a privacy violation

                    Lot of very special people in this thread on Lemmy today.

                    Yes, yes there are.

                • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, i mean in today’s world, i value privacy too, but don’t you wish you lived in a world where we were more in tune with the natural world and our natural selves?

                  • jaybone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’m betting this same person you are arguing with is a vocal atheist who doesn’t realize religion is what imposed this shame upon our natural form, and probably that taboo contributes to the sexualization.

              • x4740N@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                STOP SHARING NAKED IMAGES OF PEOPLE WHO CANNOT CONSENT

                IT IS THEIR BODY, NOT THEIR PARENTS AND NOT YOURS

                WHY IS CONSENT SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND

                  • x4740N@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’m an adult

                    I’m sure you wouldn’t want your parents taking naked pictures of you now and showing people

                    How is it any different from when you are a baby

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Stop sharing any photos of people who don’t give consent, whether they can or not.

              In an alternate timeline where we never had the stigma around nudity, I’d be just as embarrassed of my nose in a photo than I would of my penis.

              Or maybe 10 years after I cut ties with you because you became a massive douche sandwich, I don’t want my picture on the same Facebook wall as your white pride rally.

              Not you, personally, but any body really.

          • x4740N@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            Still shouldn’t be sharing naked pictures of people without consent and of people who cannot consent

          • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Hmm, that’s a good point, I was just clarifying what Dark Arc said as far as I can tell. You’re right neither should be sexualized, but in the world we live in neither should be shared IMO.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            neither should be bad.

            Yes, they both should be bad. Don’t show people photos of naked children.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think krippix’ point (as well as the comic’s point) is that the first is socially acceptable while the second is not. And that then suggests that the first scenario should also not be socially acceptable.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            And that then suggests that the first scenario should also not be socially acceptable.

            Last part depends on interpretation. But most likely yes.

          • x4740N@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I agree with this interpretation

            Don’t take pictures of your child naked people

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think it really takes a side … just kind of points out that it’s super weird that it’s more socially acceptable in one direction than the other.

        I do hope the author intended for what I said to be the point though.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’d think so, but a disturbing number of people think the problem is there is a difference, not the nude photos.

    • Carl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      My mom has a picture of me when I was a baby taking a bath. My grandma made her censor my genitals with masking tape. I miss my grandma.