The bill’s author, state Rep. Dodie Horton, said to CNN affiliate WVUE, “It doesn’t preach any particular religion at all, but it certainly does recognize a higher power.”

  • bigkix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A Hindu shouldn’t feel bad because the motto was established back when most of the people in US were christians. You know, motto’s, flags, and things alike tend to become outdated but are part of a tradition and as such still used.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you aware the motto wasn’t established until 1956? It’s not like it has some deep rooted history. Fundamentalists took over the government and put it into place relatively recently.

      • bigkix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know, but it’s been, what, almost 70 years… Why change it now? I don’t think anyone from a non-christian religion is offended by it, right? Although, true, reverting to a previous motto would please everyone I suppose…

        • noneya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean…what’s 70 years of precedence…it’s not like Roe v. Wade or anything?

          • bigkix@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, you’re saying the motto shouldn’t be changed? :) As for RvW, as unbelivably as it might seem, I didn’t follow that one so I can’t take a position because I am not informed enough.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people in the U.S. are still Christians. What difference does that make? Congress is not supposed to establish religion. It’s right there in the first amendment. If you declare a single god, you are establishing a religion and excluding citizens that don’t believe- Hindus, Buddhists and atheists to name three.

      Would you be okay with the motto of it was “Trust in Jesus?”

      • bigkix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I know, Supreme Court ruled that it does not establish religion. I’d say the same if most of the country was Hindu and it referenced their deity. It’s a fucking motto and most motto’s are outdated and show some cultural reference to the people long gone.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I know what they ruled. Do you think every Supreme Court ruling is correct? Dred Scott v. Sandford was the proper decision?

          • bigkix@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, you said that most of the country is still christian? So, in a democratic society which is mostly christian there is a motto that references times when even more of the country was christian and the soul of the country was mostly christian?

            Yeah, a huge problem.

              • bigkix@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But it does not establish a any religion as a country’s official religion. It’s a remnant of past times.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The Constitution doesn’t say anything about establishing religion as the country’s official religion.

                  There’s a reason teachers aren’t allowed to lead school prayers from any religion and it has nothing to do with what the official religion of the nation is or is not.