• Moose@moose.best
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    What? Where does it say at all in the article that these woman were racist to the guys before being attacked?

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apparently the women started it, got hit, then the attack was over and everything was civil when police arrived

      That isn’t indicative of an attack, and as highlighted above the damage done is pretty minimal for 10 on 2

      However the side you take will change the version of events you believe. My point was just that the media is taking a biased approach to the story and could flip it the other way if they wanted

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh good so you caught the part where the article was displaying a bias

          My statement wouldn’t have made sense if you didn’t

          Did you catch the part where she says the men claim she started it and the media didn’t follow up on it?

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Lol, I haven’t taken a side

              I just pointed out a bias and that there isn’t enough information for anyone to take a side

              • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                we tend to show bias towards the victims. even if those women started it, they shouldn’t have been beaten… by men. if you’re a man, you don’t touch a woman unless it’s self defense.

                you really come off as some kind of edgy teen douche. are you an edgy teen douche?

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  We don’t know who the victim is

                  All we know is the woman claims to be the victim and the men claim to be the victim

                  you don’t touch a woman unless it’s self defense.

                  Equality, you don’t touch anyone unless it’s self defence

                  • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    the victim is the WOMAN, how was beaten mercilessly by a GROUP OF MEN. jesus christ, people. only in a morally bankrupt society would this even be a question.

                  • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    The faux high road crap

                    because it’s impossible that someone in the 21st century has actual morals? you people are fucked.