• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    No…no it does not…how are you even able to say that as a fact lol. Ukraine has lost around 31k soldiers since the invasion. Mississippi does not have 15k+ gun deaths a year.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Military losses are not part of the civilian gun deaths. Ukraine lost only 10k civilians over two years. That’s 133 deaths per 1m. Mississippi is more dangerous than an active war zone, that’s a fact.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And that’s not even the only comparison.

        https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/10/31/1209683893/how-the-u-s-gun-violence-death-rate-compares-with-the-rest-of-the-world

        US gun violence rate higher than nearly all Sub-Saharan countries, which are among the world’s poorest.

        When casualties of military conflicts are factored out, the US gun violence rate is higher than even countries in conflict ridden regions like the Mid-East

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Saying Ukraine during an active war which already had lower civilian gun deaths than the usa and then saying “no that’s not what I meant” is hilarious. It’s like if Germany or Poland were invaded and you said the same thing. You’re post is pointless.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lol wut? Once again - Ukraine during an active war IS safer than the US.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ukraine pre-war already had a lower firearm homicide rate than the US…on top of that, they armed a huge portion of their population when they were invaded…so your point is even worse since they gave out literal assault rifles to civilians and their firearm homicide rate was still lower… sounds like its not the guns.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Lol yea safer and they handed out rifles to civilians…so what is it? Is it the guns still or not? Because last I checked militaries fight each other with real guns, not nerf.