• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    and their opinions are not reflective or representative of anything

    Are you serious? The vast majority of the voting age citizenry are ignoramuses.

    • newfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I am serious that anecdotal evidence is not statistically significant and that, therefore, one random child is not representative of anything

        • newfie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          So if the above person was familiar with Whitmer then I should presume that most people also are?

          Your points aren’t making sense. Anecdotal evidence gathered from a non-American child’s comments on a random post on a fringe STEM-lord website is not representative of anything.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Jesus you people are insufferable. Not knowing about Whitmer is a single anecdote that is consistent with a trend that is quite obvious and so help me god if you do that sealioning bullshit demanding a peer reviewed study about Whitmers name recognition

            • newfie@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              consistent with a trend that is quite obvious

              What trend?

              sealioning

              Using terms like this makes one sound socially maladjusted. Which makes sense given the site we’re on. Which reinforces my point that a random comment has no representative value - people on here are STEM-brained weirdos or are bots. Either way, not exactly representative of the median adult US voter