Some Republicans are starting to seriously regret Donald Trump’s vice presidential nominee, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance.

It’s been only one week since Vance was nominated at the Republican National Convention, and already his own party members are expressing severe doubts about Trump’s pick. The former president’s allies have acknowledged that nominating Vance was the product of Trump’s absolute certainty that he would be able to defeat Joe Biden in November. While Vance wouldn’t do much for swing voters or independents, he would likely shore up support among Trump’s base.

But ever since Biden passed the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party’s new presumptive nominee, Republicans have begun to sour on Vance.

“The road got a lot harder. He was the only pick that wasn’t the safe pick. And I think everyone has now realized that,” one House Republican told Axios Thursday, under the condition of anonymity.

Another House Republican told Axios that Vance “doesn’t add much.”

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s amazing how much Trump got played. The democrats had to know Biden was going to drop out when they scheduled the earliest presidential debate in history. It was all a show so people would demand Biden drop out before he actually dropped out.

    And not only did Trump agree to it (cause his ego told him he would dominate), now he’s picked a god awful VP pick cause he thought he knew who his opponent was.

      • jas0n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ha, yeah. I’ve been a registered Democrat since I was 18. No freaking way they tried at something so hard like that.

      • cheeseandrice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m more cynical about the DNC than anybody but - people daydream all the time about what could happen in the future if this or that happens. Some asshole right winger started daydreaming about taking over the Supreme Court back in the 1970s and it doesn’t mean that he planned it all out but you can still think about the next few moves to be ready if the opportunity arises.

        Somebody in the DNC imagined this scenario many months/years ago and talked about it to their bosses. Gaming out the possibilities and having the slide deck ready is how wild, game changing moves like this end up happening.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 months ago

      The democrats had to know Biden was going to drop out when they scheduled the earliest presidential debate in history.

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re talking an extraordinary amount of stupidity vs a moderate amount of planning.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If this election can teach us anything, if you live in a bubble then you have some incredibly stupid blind spots.

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              The democratic party has as many bubbles as they have geriatric candidates. A candidate manages their staff, but the staff can also manage the candidate and it creeps into elderly abuse at a certain point. Look at Diane Feinstein or RBG: two people who should have retired but their staff didn’t want to loose their relative power so they filter what their boss sees. I’m sure the same is true for Trump. Biden at least has Pelosi to pull his head from his ass and showed him the real numbers his staff wasn’t showing.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        While I’m normally inclined to agree, this presidential debate was both historic in how early it was and historic in how bad Biden performed. There is no reason to be this aggressive about scheduling unless they know he’s either going to fail epically, or succeed epically.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The only thing historic is about how utterly convinced that people are that Biden was awful in it.

          I watched the debate. He wasnt 1/100th as awful as everyone has seemingly hallucinated themselves into thinking thanks to an endless avalance of propaganda screaming “BIDEN FAILED/INCOMPETENT,HUMILIATED/ETC”

          The most awful thing about the fucking debate is the moderator kept letting trump go off on rants and not correcting/stoping him. Bidens performance isnt even in the top 3.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            People are allowed to have different opinions. Yours just happens to be in the minority.

              • danc4498@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                For sure, like you and I both focus on facts (even though in this case it is 100% subjective how you think he performed) and I for sure ignore groupthink and feels as well and we both have different opinions. It’s aMaZiNg!