☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoUS 15 years behind China in nuclear power – reportwww.power-technology.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1103cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1103external-linkUS 15 years behind China in nuclear power – reportwww.power-technology.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squarehuf [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agohow hard can it be? it’s basically bombing a reactor in reverse.
minus-squareroux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYou’d think the US would be all about it then.
minus-squarehuf [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year agoin reverse. so no, that’d be the SU. and anyway, bombing a reactor in reverse means you end up with a bomb and a reactor, and the US doesnt make things.
minus-squarePili [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou mean removing freedom from a reactor?! No thanks.
deleted by creator
how hard can it be? it’s basically bombing a reactor in reverse.
You’d think the US would be all about it then.
in reverse. so no, that’d be the SU.
and anyway, bombing a reactor in reverse means you end up with a bomb and a reactor, and the US doesnt make things.
You mean removing freedom from a reactor?! No thanks.