The weirdo is being really explicit that the Republican party is going to convert the country into a Guided Democracy — a form of dictatorship where elections are held but how people vote doesn’t impact who holds power — much like Russia is today.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s actually worse than the headline suggests. He was explicitly asked to clarify it in the context of “people are saying you want to subvert democracy”. He then refused to and repeated the statment

    Can’t claim it’s “just a joke” or taken out of context when the context is someone asking you if you plan to subvert democracy


    From the article:

    "It’s being interpreted, as you are not surprised to hear, by the left as, well, they’re never going to have another election,” she said. “So can you even just respond —”

    Mr. Trump cut her off, claiming again that Christians “vote in very small percentages,” and digressing into how he would change voting practices.

    He then repeated his statement from Friday once more, saying his message had been: “Don’t worry about the future. You have to vote on Nov. 5. After that, you don’t have to worry about voting anymore. I don’t care, because we’re going to fix it. The country will be fixed and we won’t even need your vote anymore, because frankly we will have such love, if you don’t want to vote anymore, that’s OK.”

    • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Annoyingly that “we’ll have so much love” addition, combined with the weird claim that Christians don’t vote much, actually does make me more willing to think he means that he’ll have done such a good job and the GOP will be so beloved, that the “small” % of Christian voters won’t be necessary for wins anymore, so they won’t need to worry about voting, it will still be a shoe-in without them.

      Still ludicrous claims across the board of course, regardless.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why give the benifit of the doubt when this is a repeated pattern across his statement

        When asked to denounce claims of him being a dictator, he said he’s “only be a dictator on day one”

        He keeps making these statments. When someone shows you who they are, believe them

        • doctorskull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why give the benefit of the doubt when this is a repeated pattern

          This is exactly it. Trump is very good at saying just enough so that we know what he means and his followers know what he means while maintaining plausible deniability when confronted with his own statements.

  • elgordino@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    He’s going to keep saying it while people keep reporting it so urgently. Anything to get back into the news after the Dem’s stole the spotlight for a bit.

  • 242@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “I said, vote for me, you’re not going to have to do it ever again. It’s true,” he said. “Because we have to get the vote out. Christians are not known as a big voting group. They don’t vote. And I’m explaining that to them. You never vote. This time, vote. I’ll straighten out the country, you won’t have to vote anymore. I won’t need your vote.”

    This is just total nonsense. Christians don’t vote? Yeah, right. I get that he’s trying to come up with an explanation for basically saying he’s going to cancel future elections if he wins, but saying his fan base has a low voter turnout is an absurd justification.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess this is also what is alienating some of the republicans. If he takes power, it’s no longer a matter of being red or blue, or gerrymandering and cheating their way to success, it’d only be about being loyal to the fascist regime and hoping to be rewarded. It’s a complete loss of control for everyone but Trump. Even the bootlickers will be in his grace, except he has none, and they know it.

    It’s simply not worth it for republicans. Trump is not a republican. He’s a celebrity gone fascist. He took over their party because they couldn’t unite on anything else but opposition.

    The regime wouldn’t last long though. Trump is old and unhealthy. It’s very likely that another term would be the end of him. What happens to their plan then?

    Truth is, he doesn’t give a shit about the next election in 2028. He just wants the power to clear off the criminal records right now.

    Even if someone wanted democracy to go away, it’s an easy promise for Trump to make, but it’s unlikely he’ll see it through or that anyone else could do it successfully.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      All it takes is a Court and a Republican-majority Congress that go along, and it’s very clear that they’re willing to do so if he asks.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The regime wouldn’t last long though. Trump is old and unhealthy. It’s very likely that another term would be the end of him. What happens to their plan then?

      That’s the point. He takes bribes and will die soon. That means the billionaire class funding him can control him or just wait for his inevitable heart attack.

      See also: Peter Thiel’s Dark Enlightenment and rejection of democracy, and how he took Vance under his wing.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s a gift link. No paywall for 30 days, aside from a quite small chunk of people who have done something unusual to break gift links.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago
    New York Times Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    New York Times is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

    Wikipedia Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

    Wikipedia is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Least Biased
    Factual Reporting: Mixed
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.