• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Ελληνικά
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why would you, who likely spend no effort at all in building or maintaining the house of your father have any special rights?

    By this logic, why should any outside party who absolutely didn’t put any effort in to the property get to claim it?

    [The] distinction is clear: regular usage. Nothing arbitrary about that at all.

    What counts as regular usage? This didn’t answer the question, it just kicked the can down the road a little way. Who or what determines when my property transitions from personal to private?

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No the logic is the age old “from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs”. They get to claim it as personal property if they have a need for it and actually live in it.

      But it is very easy to determine regular use in all but some edge cases where the established previous user would get preference due to customary rights. And your personal property can’t transition to private property, as private property wouldn’t exist.

      But lets assume you are right and it is difficult to determine. What would you rather have? Some disagreements over the use of a garage between neighbors, or wide scale violent enforcement of private property for a few that claim ownership of hundreds or thousands of houses? Because that is what you are defending here, and by doing so you are the useful idiot of the capitalist elite.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs

        Great, who determines ability and needs?

        Some disagreements over the use of a garage between neighbors,

        Sure, the garage scenario is plausible, but the bigger implications is what happens if someone decides they need my car, or my house, or my toothbrush more than I do? What’s my motivation to work, to earn, or to risk if the payoff is the same as someone who does nothing?

        You say that no one would take anything from anyone, because there is no private ownership, but almost everyone privately owns their shit right now, it would all have to transition to your idea of “personal” non-ownership. So someone IS taking all the stuff from everyone, you just have a roundabout way of saying it, or you don’t understand the implications of what you are actually saying.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You are back at arguing a strawman 🫠

          I never once said anything about someone needing something more than you do. I talked about actually using it or not. That is not hard to determine at all and it is also not hard to determine if someone has a genuine need for a house for example.

          And no one every said anything about work not being rewarded. Seriously, read again what I wrote. I said the exact opposite… rents, inheritance and stealing other people’s personal property (by claiming it is private property) are means of withholding and extracting value without any work.

          And you are again confusing private property with personal property / ownership. Yes everyone has personal property… that’s fine. No one is coming for your toothbrush. Don’t worry!

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            That toothbrush you have. I need it more. Give it here. I’m coming for the toothbrush.

            But if someone else would come and ask if they can use it since evidently you don’t, there is not much you could do about it other that asking them to voluntarily reimburse you for your costs

            Here you are, talking about someone being able to take a garage that I converted into a living space, because they need it more that I am using it. So yes, you did say that someone could take my stuff from me.

            How would you genuinely determine need for a house? Who is going to build houses if someone else just gets to live in them for free? What’s the motivation for building houses?

            And no one every said anything about work not being rewarded.

            No, but it’s implicit in the quote from Karl Marx* that you sent me earlier. From each by ability to each by need covienently forgets about the efforts of each. Which is an inherent flaw of Marxism.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                Ελληνικά
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Woah woah woah there! I’m not stealing. I just really need that toothbrush, badly, and I can take it from you and I don’t have to pay you for it. I should give you some money maybe, but I’m certainly not legally compelled to, so I won’t. Didn’t you read anything you wrote?

                • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Look, you are arguing a strawman, how many times do I need to repeat that personal property is not determined by needing something more or less then someone else, but by actual usage?

                  But sure, if you urgently need a toothbrush, and I am not actually using mine, you can have it. Totally free.

                  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    Ελληνικά
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Cool. I’m going to need your car too.

                    For what is is worth, I looked up personal vs private property, and it seems that the actual distinction isn’t usage, it’s portability. So, you would have a right to your toothbrush, car, and money, but your home, business, or farm would not belong to you. So if I wanted your house, I could reasonable make a claim that I needed it and “take” it from you. (Although it can’t technically be taking since you don’t have any ownership, and very few “rights” to the house.)

                    So, let’s follow that up with a question.

                    How hard are you going to work on maintaining or improving your home, if you know that someone else, who can’t live in their home because they didn’t maintain it, can just make a claim on your home, and have a reasonable chance of getting it?

                    The system you’re describing doesn’t make everyone free of economic violence, it forces everyone to be serfs for one giant entity (the country).

                    While you’re reading up on Marxism, and personal vs private property, go ahead and read up on what a strawman is, because you’ve accused me twice of building a strawman without merit, and I have doubts that you genuinely understand the concept.