• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t really see the issue. Minimalism is a sliding scale.

    Just because the design goal was for it to be more minimalist than a typical Android/iOS phone doesn’t mean they have to go full-on “NO. It’s only for phonecalls and maybe SMS!”

    Playing music isn’t particularly “maximalist”, and WhatsApp certainly isn’t (people in the US need to understand that WhatsApp is basically SMS for most of the world). Maybe maps is, but it’s optional anyway so who cares.

    This device looks very cool to me. But there’s no way it won’t cost an absolute fortune, which kills it IMO.

    • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Even in USA nobody ever SMS me. Messenger and insta are primary with WhatsApp and signal sometimes being relevant and wechat for the Chinese community.

      • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Crazy, most people use SMS with Messenger as the go to for big groups for me (in USA). No one I know uses WhatsApp

          • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m just giving anecdotal evidence, just like you gave 🤷‍♂️ I’m not promoting one way of communicating vs another.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Unencrypted is not the thing that bothers me - after all, Telegram is so popular, so not like most people even care. What bothers me is that you still need to pay for each one! You have to edit the texts to fit into a tiny arbitrary character restriction or else you’s be charged for a second message! Why is data do relatively cheap, but those messages are still overpriced?

            • wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Mobile plans as standard here (in the UK) offer SMS for free, can’t remember when they used to routinely charge tbh. But I think I only text my dad as he’s very old school, everyone else is Signal/WhatsApp/Telegram

            • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Huh I haven’t met anyone on telegram yet. Agreed if you somehow didn’t have infinite SMS in your plan you are taking an L

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Unlimited SMS here are rare, and my carrier in particular does not have them at least on the lower-end plans. I rarely notice though.

                Telegram is popular here, especially among youth - my university groupchats are there, for example. Whatsapp is still probably bigger though.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s the same for me in Australia. Millenials and older use Messenger or SMS while Gen Z and younger use Instagram or Snapchat.