• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    How useful is Veterans Day or Labor Day? They’re all useless. We don’t have them for their usefulness.

  • Tilted@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for adding more holidays. A voting holiday is an easy win. No need to replace or remove holidays.

  • aelwero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re suggesting cancelling Juneteenth because it “overlaps” (“” because I don’t really agree with that) MLK day, wouldn’t you cancel MLK day instead? Emancipation was a little more a step forward than the civil rights movement…

    Of course, if you consult the experts on cancelling shit, they’d most likely say that Columbus day might be a better fit in the chopping block, and IF we need to “make room on the calendar” (also bullshit) in order to make voting a legit day off (is it not? If someone who works for me asks for time off to vote, I’m going to ask them if they need a fucking ride to the polls… Come on people…), I kinda gotta go with Columbus being the least relevant current federal holiday…

    Just my opinion, mind, but cancelling the new shit because “muh traditions” is fucking dumb… Be better…

    • vern1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically Columbus Day is now Indigenous People’s Day since Biden changed it in 2021, so something much more worth celebrating IMO

      • aelwero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, so they already cancelled it? Meh…

        It’s funny though… I live smack in the middle of a reservation, and I’ve never heard of this indigenous people day. I kinda don’t think any of the tribe here gives a shit… They have their own government, and at least in our area, thats the only one they give a fuck about :)

  • errant_venture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m confused why this guy is getting any attention. He’s running the most obvious “fake primary campaign with no intention of winning in order to get a bunch of donations from rubes” con I’ve ever seen

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “Cancel Juneteenth or one of the other useless ones we made up,” Ramaswamy told an applauding crowd gathered at a welding company here.

    Asked by NBC News to clarify whether he thought Juneteenth was a “useless” holiday, Ramaswamy said, “I basically do.”

    “We don’t just look back and flog ourselves,” Ramaswamy said in the video June 19, which was posted to his account on X, the social media platform previously known as Twitter.

    As the National Museum of African American History and Culture notes, Juneteenth celebrates the anniversary of when Union troops arrived in Galveston Bay, Texas, and announced a quarter-million Black people had been freed by executive decree.

    One of his competitors, former Rep. Will Hurd of Texas, who is biracial, criticized Ramaswamy for saying he “hopes to cancel a holiday that celebrates equality and freedom.”

    On Juneteenth two months ago, the NAACP issued a statement saying, “Today we celebrate our emancipation while also acknowledging that we are still fighting for true freedom.”


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Jordan Lund
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    FTA:

    "Breaking down his plan Saturday to institute a national voting holiday, Ramaswamy, a GOP presidential candidate, proposed making space for the new holiday by canceling an old one.

    “Cancel Juneteenth or one of the other useless ones we made up,”"

    OK, so, first… all holidays are made up.

    Second, you don’t need a holiday for voting. Do what we did in Oregon 23 years ago… 100% vote by mail.

    A few weeks before the election, you get a voter’s pamphlet in the mail outlining all the candidates and ballot measures.

    Then you get the ballot, fill it out, put it in the mailing envelope, sign the back of the envelope, and send it back, either through the mail or designated drop off locations.

    When elections HQ gets the ballot, they compare the signature on the back with voter registration, if there’s a problem, they send the ballot back to the voter for correction.

    Assuming no problems, the ballot is set aside for counting once the polls close on election day. They don’t start counting sooner because they don’t want leaked results tainting the voting process.

      • Rusticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Republicans want to raise voting age because young people are increasingly realizing that Republicans are authoritarian bigots.

      • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d love to know too, cause I’m actually for lowering it. If there are 15 year Olds working jobs at fast food restaurants or wherever, they should either a) be able to vote, or b) not have income tax taken out. No taxation without representation.

        • fabian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          We already had unpassable tests used to disenfranchise people for a long time. I wonder if you don’t know about those or just agree with how they were used.

          The most ignorant and racist people I know are all over 25, why would you only want it for those under 26?

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No matter what political affiliation you have, I would wager that the current mess was not created by 18 year olds voting but older people. So if you want to be ‘fair’ and ‘reasonable’, hoe about we put restrictions on older voters on a sliding and increasingly more difficult scale?

          18 - 25 : your good to go 25 - 40 : you need some civics tests 40 - 60 : civic + psycholigical testing 60 - 70 : civics + psychological + dementia testing 70+ : you no longer get to vote as your time has past and consequences are no longer your concern yet can harm upcoming generations

          If you want limitations and testing, this is a fair proposal. I guess you would logically have to agree with this, yes?