If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.
I absolutely provided a link, it’s even labeled, “IPC Report Link”.
And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.
And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they’ve been attacked by Israel? You know what don’t answer that. I’m not sure why I even replied to this post since it’s very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel’s crimes. No matter how damning.
If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.
I absolutely provided a link, it’s even labeled, “IPC Report Link”.
And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.
And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they’ve been attacked by Israel? You know what don’t answer that. I’m not sure why I even replied to this post since it’s very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel’s crimes. No matter how damning.
The whole point of an abstract is that it’s not the entire paper, stupid
It’s a summation, science isn’t into clickbait.
I continue to recommend that you read the paper past the abstract, hope that helps
I continue to live in hope you will realize victim blaming the people you blow up isn’t an argument.
Does war exist, in your view? Or is it always a case of the winner murdering the loser, unjustifiably?
There is a large difference between war and genocide. The last group to say you couldn’t have a war without genocide was the Serbians.
But that’s what I’m asking you. Can one side achieve overwhelming victory, in your view, without you calling it a “genocide”?
No, right?
Hold on let me go check history, yup, yup, history says that it’s very possible. Which makes one wonder, why is Israel doing this?