OpenAI does not want anyone to know what o1 is “thinking" under the hood.
Less and less about OpenAI is actually… open at all.
Open to investigation: no
Open to sucking up your work and personal information: absolutely!
Open Angel Investment
What was open about them anyway? I thought it was a misnomer from the start trying to fool people into thinking they’re open source.
Whisper is open source. GPT-2 was, too.
No they started off good. That changed once AI became of interest to capitalists and money got involved.
they don’t want to be scraped! hahahahahahahahaha
Neither AI nor OpenAI’s management are capable of understanding irony.
Jonny 5: I’m alive dammit!
“OpenAI - Open for me, not for thee”
- their motto, probably
ClosedAI
We should start call them that…
Or maybe more like:
ExploitativeAIorExAIhttps://chatgpt.com/share/66e9426a-c178-800d-a34e-ae4883f70ca0
PiracyAI
They do love their…Rrrrrrrrrs. as in strawberry 🍓 has 8 RS in it sort of way… investigation results: 3 monkeys are behind the whole thing.
“We’re a scientific research company. We believe in open technology. Wait, what are you doing? Noooooo, you’re not allowed to study or examine our
programintelligent thinking machine!”
me_irl
“How dare you try to know what our product is actually capable of. No use, only pay!”
They should rebrand and put quotes around “Open.”
Open_Asshole_Intelligence
Almost makes me wonder if this is a mechanical turk situation.
Don’t look behind the curtain! It’s totally not all bullshit stats all the way down!!
Ah, the Oracle clause.
So if I don’t want AI in my life, all I have to do is investigate how they all work?
gasp ai is becoming more secretive and… dangerous to fans who might be too interested in ai? The ones who want to study it?
Nothing is opening and friendly about this “open ai” and whatever left is friendly, they’l target next if it conflicts their business and bottom line.
unrelated but needs to be stated for some:
Before someone asks “why u filter out the screenshot content”
- i’m commentating my views on the situation, and narrowing it down to what i’m talking about.
- it’s even more likely to be a fair use if I’m not reusing the entire content. Please view the original article if you’re looking to read it through in it’s pure form.
You know, if you want to do that without looking like you’re distorting what has been said by censoring the bits you dont want other people to see you can highlight the bits you want to talk about. That way other people can see the context and make their own decisions.
The article at the end of the day is there. Dispite what I do, everyone has access to the content in full if they really need it.
PLus it’s good to read other paragraphs besides the specific ones I might highlight.
What you’re doing is wasting people’s time.
You can just quotes the sections that are relevant. That is what everyone else does.
Every time you do stuff like this it always gives me a headache trying to follow what you’re trying to say, It always looks like you’re cutting words out of newspapers in order to form a ransom note.
Has a distinctive look.
Uh, so what’s with the name ‘OpenAI’?? This non-transparency does nothing to serve the name. I propose ‘DisemblingAI’ perhaps ‘ConfidenceAI’ or perhaps ‘SeeminglyAI’
