• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Perhaps you didn’t read the entire passage?

    “Which cannot be limited as required by international humanitarian law”

    Or perhaps you don’t know what those requirements are, because you don’t care?

    These can’t. They had no way of limiting or even knowing where and whom the bombs would be around when they exploded.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re talking out of your ass.

        pagers marked for Hamas

        I’m not the one “talking out of my ass” so bad I get Hamas and Hezbollah confused.

        I linked the international law. This attack breaks those laws.

        “as required”

        Aha, hmm, and what exactly are those requirements? (I know you’ve no idea, but I’ll settle for you even looking them up and reading them even for trying to still defend Israel, because that’ll still mean you’ll at least have read them)

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You have no clue what you’re talking about. You’re a real life Dunning Kruger curve.

          I learned International law in law school and in my profession of decades, not from Googling links and pretending to be an expert.

          I’m not going to call you an anti-semite for these bullshit arguments you read online because I know it’s just that you’re ignorant, but the reason many people would is because you are applying a heightened standard of law to Israel but not anywhere else, you are holding Israel to a standard that you do not apply to Iran and the violent pan-Islamist nationalists that it backs on all sides of Israel, and are willing to defend it when pan-Islamists do mass shootings and mass kidnappings of civilians, which is their new thing, ever since suicide bombings became faux pas.