Feds target SUV, truck size to save pedestrian lives — ‘one of the last frontiers of vehicle safety’
chicago.suntimes.com
The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration stunned safety advocates by proposing new vehicle design rules that it says will help reduce pedestrian deaths. The rules will likely change vehicle design permanently.
  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    17·
    2 months ago

    They’ll use some tonnage loophole to exempt their murder plow trucks by classing them as commercial vehicles and thereby increasing the size and deadliness as well as reducing fuel economy even more. Three birds with one stone!

    agony-deep

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
    15·
    2 months ago

    The quote in context

    The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has now taken steps to address that issue, stunning safety advocates with proposed vehicle design rules that the regulatory agency says will help reduce pedestrian deaths.

    For the first time ever, manufacturers would be required to study the impact of test dummies hit outside of vehicles. The rules would likely change the design of what America drives permanently.

    “We have a crisis of roadway deaths, and it’s even worse among vulnerable road users like pedestrians,” Sophie Shulman, the agency’s deputy administrator, said in a statement announcing the proposed rule last week.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
      7·
      2 months ago

      manufacturers would be required to study the impact of test dummies hit outside of vehicles.

      Okay so they’re totally just going to say they passed their study with flying colors until they get caught juking the stats resulting in a $10,000 fee.

      $10,000 is $10,000 I guess.

  • Rojo27 [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    15·
    2 months ago

    I want to be optimistic about this, but knowing how things are here manufacturers will drag their feet on this and the government will be happy to let them do so.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      9·
      2 months ago

      I am very unoptimistic. I posted this because what I made my title was in a Bluesky post. At first when I saw it - I couldn’t believe it. Then after about five seconds I had to laugh at myself. Recently literally about once a day at Hexbear I’ve been making fun of how regulations and laws about stuff like food safety are a joke. Why would similar stuff about cars be any different? That would make no sense! In fact - the lack of such testing by the federal government started to make sense to me.

      Surely a firm like Volvo has done “outside of vehicles” testing but why would any typical American firm? That would just get in the way of profits. And once they saw a highly profitable market for ginormous obscene vehicles - they had a strong impetus not to test. If you don’t test - you get no bad data. It’s Trump logic but it works. If they did tests - even secret ones - eventually the public would learn about them and get mad. Also - I’m not a lawyer but there might be legal liability.

      Sure - anybody involved in creating those cars could easily see they’d be a total nightmare to pedestrians and in particular to children but why let that gruesome and ugly reality get in the way of fat, juicy profits? Making as much money as possible is as American as it gets.

    • chungusamonugs [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
      7·
      2 months ago

      I’m of the philosophy that anyone with an suv or pickup that isn’t associate with a business should be able to pass a class C license test ( newsflash-asshole 90% of them could not) or have their death machine confiscated with zero reimbursement.

    • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
      4·
      2 months ago

      They’re reinstating Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell for car manufacturers to counter the allegations that car manufacturers are woke.