[alt text: an illustration of a person with a head-empty expression on their face, who is saying, “Not letting your cat outside is CRUEL!” Around the person are various gruesome scenes of different cats in distress. From the top and going clockwise, the scenes include: a cat being carried away by a hawk; a cat that is on fire; a dead cat in the road that has been run over by a car; several dead kittens; a cat that is missing an eye and various patches of fur; a cat that is feasting on a songbird; and a cat that is being carried away by a coyote. The person appears to be completely oblivious to these scenes of distress.]

  • BorgDrone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    a menace to your local ecology.

    That’s a funny way of saying ‘pest control’.

      • BorgDrone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t even know where I live. What endangered songbirds? Also: very few cats are actually capable of catching birds. We mostly have jackdaws around here, and they are way too smart to get caught. They like to taunt the cats.

        • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          read the study yourself. The most commonly preyed-upon species by cats is birds. It’s a global problem. I will grant you that perhaps cats fit slightly better into the urban ecosystems of Europe, but this is a minor point. They still have an outsized population due to human influence, so they will always be massively disruptive to local ecology. And none of this is considering the danger posed to the cats themselves, whom we all love.

    • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Trolling, intentionally obtuse, or just dumb? Because as we all know, cats never kill anything but pests. Native animals would never become endangered because of domesticated cats. At least put a bell on them or something so they don’t kill the wildlife.

      • BorgDrone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That depends entirely on where you live. Cats are pretty much native animals here in Europe.

        At least put a bell on them or something so they don’t kill the wildlife.

        Tell me you’ve never owned a cat without telling me you’ve never owned a cat.

        • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          even if they are native animals, the SIZE of their population is caused by humans, and so they are disruptive to their local ecology. and bell or no bell, letting your cat outside unsupervised is leaving them to get hit by a car, or tortured by mean kids, or scooped up by a predator, or stealth-adopted by someone who cares about the well-being of cats more than you do. I’m assuming you wouldn’t be happy with any of those things happening to your cat.

        • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I own two cats, and they both have bells. They haven’t killed any wildlife since then. Cats are not native animals in Europe, they are very much invasive and devastated local populations of birds and small mammals.