• uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bluesky is decentralized only in its name. And media storage.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This isn’t necessarily true. Just because their architecture is harder and not a simple server host does not strip away its decentralization.

      They have decentralized the following:

      • App access (can build your own or show openProto posts in your platform

      • Algorithms

      • Relay (backend albeit rumored to be expensive)

      • More if you consider the domain name hosting stuff and media storage control. Also moderation is planned to be decentralized.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Isn’t the only thing that really matters decentralised control?

        Open protocols and APIs seem pretty meaningless to me if there’s a single point of control for the brand.

        If everyone migrates to bluesky and then bluesky says “of we’re not doing that open thing anymore because of this new embiggened thing we’re doing” everyone will still be on bluesky.

        • Sl00k@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Open protocols and APIs seem pretty meaningless to me if there’s a single point of control for the brand.

          You’d need to expand on this more for me to understand you. Yes there’s a single point of control from a moderation standpoint (labeler), as there is on Lemmy instances. But anyone can host their own ATProto relays and the Bluesky relay will federate with each other automatically.

          If everyone migrates to bluesky and then bluesky says “of we’re not doing that open thing anymore because of this new embiggened thing we’re doing” everyone will still be on bluesky.

          Not necessarily because the accounts are atProto accounts and you can migrate to another platform(albeit another doesn’t exist yet) without data loss. As far as the Bluesky app goes it really just shows you atProto posts and hosts your data (similar to Lemmy instances) they as an entity just also maintain the OSS backend Relay crawler and more.

          I really think a lot of people have this perspective that it’s not decentralized just because it truly is a lot more complicated due to there being like 5 different moving pieces of decentralization (PDS, Relay, Appview, tbd labeler, algorithm) and they do a great job at obscuring it for regular users which is a great thing. And nobody has really tinkered around and set-up any sites or integrations with it yet. I’m personally trying to get a two way mastodon integration as it’s possible but nobody has done a solid implementation (just somewhat gnarly bridges between protocols)

            • Sl00k@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              If you can build your own or selfhost each of the following to read and push back to all of the atProto protocol:

              1. App

              2. Backend Relay

              3. Moderation

              4. Algorithm

              And you still say that’s not decentralized I’m not sure what you’re looking for nor what your definition of decentralization is.

      • Elle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Relay (backend albeit rumored to be expensive)

        Not even rumored, so much as explicitly expected.

        The federation architecture allows anyone to host a Relay, though it’s a fairly resource-demanding service. In all likelihood, there may be a few large full-network providers, and then a long tail of partial-network providers.

        • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          This doesn’t seem to be that big an issue as PDS’s can just directly communicate with one-another like how ActivityPub works.

          • Elle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re supposed to be able to, true, but I’ve not come across any examples of that in action yet. If you know of any I’d be interested in seeing them, as I’ve been trying to keep up with AuthTransfer’s developments.

              • Elle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Hmm, if so, it wasn’t clear in the documentation I read. I was of the impression it was still passing posts through the relay to enable others’ discovery & interaction.

                • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I could be mistaken too, this has all only recently become interoperable so there’s some growing pains