Summary

Americans, frustrated by high grocery prices, are looking to President-elect Trump for relief. Trump has pledged to lower food costs through tariffs on imports and by reducing energy prices, arguing that these measures would benefit U.S. farmers and consumers.

However, experts warn that tariffs could drive up prices by increasing costs for imported goods essential to food production and risk retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports.

Economists also doubt Trump’s short-term impact on energy costs, noting that sustained grocery price drops are challenging without major economic shifts.

  • Jinni@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 days ago

    Anyone who understood what tariffs are could of told you this. Harris may not of had any economic plans other than ctax the 1%', but Trump’s was demonstrably counter productive with tariffs

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      Let me put it there for those idiots.

      Tarrifs on food imports would be great for US farmers because they no longer have to compete with low priced imports, as the cost to import increases. You would induce a shortage at the current price point, resulting in less food avaliable and at a higher price.

      Small point - farmers would probably still miss out as resellers and supermarkets take much of the marginal profit.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I think you might be looking at this wrong. Over 20% of agricultural products are exported in the US, less than 15% is imported. Food is a substitution commodity, if you can’t buy one kind, you will buy another.

        There is and will be no shortage of food in America. Food grown in central and south America? Maybe. This will just hurt all those farms exporting soy beans when the retaliation comes in to play.

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yes, you are correct but I disagree on few technicalities that make a difference.

          • products do have substitutes, but you are talking comming down from a global market. Calories are there, but we don’t eat based on calories. You can’t substitute soybeans for tomatoes, potatoes for corn, or many others i don’t have examples for.

          • when the US starts putting in tarrifs for import, other nation states will likely do the same. Your exports of unwanted goods will no longer be competitive in the global market, leading to an excess of unwanted, cheap food and shortage of wanted, expensive food.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 days ago

            You should look up the last time the US employed massive tariffs in a trade war. Spoilers, it was just before the Great depression.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        On the other hand, with all of their workers having been deported, farmers wouldn’t be able to produce anything at all. This is why I want to believe that Republican talk of deportation is just bluster, but I thought that about Roe v. Wade as well.