• P_P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    11 days ago

    Ups his cred with Republicans. They love pedophiles.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              “Pedophilia” is a psychological term, not a legal one. Perhaps you are looking for “rape.”

              Treating “pedophile” as a synonym for “child molester” is like treating “schizophrenic” as a synonym for “axe murder”. Using psychological conditions as slurs and everyday metaphors is harmful.

            • marx2k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 days ago

              Explain how I’m wrong? Or did you think banging a 17 year old is literally pedophilia?

              It’s annoying when right wing weirdos label everyone that disagrees with them a pedo, it’s not any less annoying when it’s done by everyone else.

              • Kichae@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 days ago

                Arguing that wanting to have sex with a minor is anything but is a take, and definitely has me glad Boost supports user tagging.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                Do you often find yourself being labeled as a pedo? Might want to rethink some things then.

                • marx2k@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  I was often finding myself beyond labeled as a pedo. On twitter. By maga morons that label everyone they disagree with a pedo.

                  I did rethink some things and went to lemmy. I guess not much changes.

      • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Not even a crime in most states: https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/age-of-consent-in-each-us-state-1701408847-1

        (This is coming from an Aussie where 16 is the AoC in all states. We have exceptions that make it 18 if the other party has a duty of care tho)

        Edit: I should add that it’s still fucking creepy and weird when an older man does this. Just, not pedophilia, and not by default (statutory) rape in most places. Unlike what the people in this thread seem to think.

        It’s almost like we shouldn’t water down such serious terms by lumping everything in with it.

              • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 days ago

                I already gave the “obvious right answer”:

                Edit: I should add that it’s still fucking creepy and weird when an older man does this. Just, not pedophilia, and not by default (statutory) rape in most places. Unlike what the people in this thread seem to think.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Indeed they do. And since you seem to be under the impression that those definitions do not change, please define ‘silly’ for me as it was defined when it began to be used in late Middle English.

            I feel you’re being silly regardless of the early or current definition of the word, but I’m betting you also don’t use the word that way.

                • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 days ago

                  Because your request was rhetorical and his is not, having a concrete answer that is actually fucking relevant and essential to the discussion.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            based on how people use them, not ordained by the gods of language. people say pedophile to mean someone who rapes a minor.

            • marx2k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              I mean you can also say someone is a murderer of they eat cabbage, but you’d be wrong.

              Calling everyone you dislike a pedo is as lame as calling everyone you dislike a commie or Hitler.

              Seriously… having sex with or raping a 17 year old doesn’t make you a pedophile. It makes you a statutory rapist. That’s bad enough without having to make dumb shit up as an insult.

              I’m surprised and disappointed so many on lemmy are falling into that sort of weak bullshit but… here we are

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                what you should be disappointed in is not being able to make an argument without strawmanning multiple times.

                what you’re doing is just refusing to cooperate on language that’s already obvious and widely understood. it’s bad faith.

                • marx2k@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I’ve made the argument countless times. If you want to call raping a 17 year old pedophilia, that’s up to you. I’m not going to call a swimming pool a lake.