• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    In a recent court proceeding, WMF’s legal team offered a supposed middle path, proposing it take the unusual step of serving summons to the editors itself, thereby revealing their identities only to the court, not the wider public. Wikipedians, however, do not see this as a compromise—it’s capitulation. Last week, Wikipedia editors published an open letter to the Foundation, urging it to protect its volunteers’ privacy regardless of the outcome. It reads in part

    only to the court, not the wider public

    Would this really be that much better? Once the information is out, it’s impossible to hide again

    And the consequences would not end with this case. Compliance may discourage contributions from editors worldwide, not just those under authoritarian rule. WMF submission could encourage other governments to make similar demands, putting Wikipedia in an untenable position and reducing its influence where free knowledge is needed most

    This bit also seemed important

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      4 days ago

      Wikipedia has plenty of experience being blocked in the world’s largest country, which was the case until India’s population surpassed China’s in April 2023. If India takes the most drastic step, the Foundation can stand proud in its resolve.

      Sounds easy enough to me.