• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    I mean, yeah. But also, this isn’t really any different from kids not being allowed to drink alcohol before a specific age, movies and video games having age minima, etc etc.

    And I would surmise the same reasoning applies: On average, someone so young has neither the mental development nor the life experience to be able to judge well what they are doing with their own information and how to judge/process the information they get shown.

    Of course, this should happen in conjunction with actual education, like I at least had for alcohol and stuff. But it’s an entirely normal thing if it happens as part of a multi-step process (and I am not australian enough to judge how well those things work out in australia in general).

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      But it IS different. If you compare to alcohol for example, age checks are performed in shops. No record of those is made or available to anyone. There is no centralized infrastructure related to age checks that could be abused in the future to track everyone who buys alhocol.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah but if you think about to, from a law perspective that’s an implementation detail. Sure, from our perspective it’s a really important one, but from the perspective of a lawmaker it’s about whether it should be done, not how it’ll be done in execution (different branches of state, basically).

        • ouch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          You are correct that from juridical point of view the difference does not seem great.

          Hopefully politicians listen to experts of different fields.