Alphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoThe influencer lawsuit that could change the industrywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up125cross-posted to: aiop@lemmy.world
arrow-up125external-linkThe influencer lawsuit that could change the industrywww.theverge.comAlphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: aiop@lemmy.world
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoI was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph. Someone suing someone else for ‘stealing’ their ‘minimalist aesthetic’ deserves to lose and get a lesson from the ol’ clue by four.
minus-squarefmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoWait… Sounds like you are still pro-defendant?
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoYes. “I was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph.” = “I agreed with this position before the end of the first section of words” Without something to negate that statement, the statement’s meaning is exactly what it says.
I was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph. Someone suing someone else for ‘stealing’ their ‘minimalist aesthetic’ deserves to lose and get a lesson from the ol’ clue by four.
Wait… Sounds like you are still pro-defendant?
Yes. “I was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph.” = “I agreed with this position before the end of the first section of words”
Without something to negate that statement, the statement’s meaning is exactly what it says.