Pretty damning review.

        • picassowary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          1 year ago

          ruining a prototype product, talking shit about it, and then selling it is a lot worse than being “just an ass”

                  • King@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    So?

                    Edit wait are you claiming redditor is an ad hominem? Do you think that migrating to lemmy from reddit for a month puts you so much higher above redditors that u perceive being called one as an attack directed against you??? LMFAOOOOOO

            • picassowary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              the dictionary definition of evil is “morally reprehensible”. you don’t need to overreact by going straight to a godwin

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that their point that it’s an $800 product for a last-gen card, there really isn’t anyone out there that should buy this, and therefore it’s a bad product is valid. They could have handled the whole thing better and honestly should’ve just scrapped the video before release.

      Auctioning off the prototype when the company asked for it back is pretty inexcusable. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t malicious, but they clearly have problems with internal communication of things like this are happening.

      At any rate, it’s going to be a spicy WAN show this week. Linus needs to actually watch the video and address this point-by-point. If he “reads the comments” or cherry picks some of GN’s weaker arguments he’s just going to end up throwing fuel on the fire.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then they shouldn’t have reviewed it if their decision was made before even holding the product in their hand.

        They could have reviewed it from the point of view of an R&D curiosity with the potential future iterations and cost reductions as the new startup finds their feet. Because, you know, that’s what it was. But they decided to shit all over it for dishonest reasons instead.

      • ghostinthessh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s pretty normal for water blocks to come out well after a GPUs release. Also it looks like it was a new product/company so it makes sense the design took longer than the competition.

      • nachom97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dont think it was malicious, but it is incredibly negligent. It puts a huge stain on the company that’s expected to honor embargos for unreleased products.

      • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel that if LMG looked at this product and thought “hey this is really dogshit”, the decent thing to do would have been to go back to billet and tell them we can’t cover it at all (and cop the loss of few hours as part of running an ethical business)

    • ElusiveClarity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why he won’t just own up to the wrong gpu thing and move on. It’s like getting pissy that the f150 exhaust sounds like shit on your ford ranger.

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      If LMG gave out a prototype for their latest screwdriver to be reviewed and it was onsold, I highly doubt it being called a “mistake” would have sufficed, heads would be rolling

      Feel terrible for Billet and how they were treated here

      • legion02@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ltt is certainly not innocent here but this one I’ll disagree with since it basically just happened to them with an early sample of the backpack.

      • Contend6248@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Billet was treated very bad here and i’m not trying to defend anyone, but i didn’t saw the video and only heard from them because of this shitshow