• smeeps@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shared paths are more dangerous to use if you’re going at any speed. Motorists aren’t looking for cyclists when driving over them into side roads and driveways, and cyclists lose priority at every side road.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re probably not looking for you whizzing up the middle of them either.

      At the end of the day you’re a squishy meat sack and they’re in a two ton metal box, albeit in central London, one travelling at about 5 mph. If you feel safer doing that then you do you. I’m just saying I wouldn’t.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Feel what you want to feel, but we have data that it’s safer on the road than the “pavement” (sidewalks in the UK) and I’d rather go by data than feelings. Feeling safe is not the same as being safe.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quite so. My city in Australia has excellent shared paths, but the one paralleling one main road is the only one where I have had a close call with a car

      On that route I ride on the road so I’m seen and cars can avoid me