Summary

A federal judge in Rhode Island ordered the Trump administration to unfreeze federal funding, accusing it of violating a previous court ruling.

The lawsuit, filed by 22 states and D.C., argues the freeze is unconstitutional and causing harm. Trump, JD Vance, and Elon Musk have suggested defying court orders.

The administration appealed the ruling, while legal experts warn officials like the Treasury Secretary could face contempt charges if they ignore it.

The case tests executive power limits and judicial authority.

  • atempuser23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Way too far down the list but you need to arrest the actual civil servants implementing this. Trump is immune but the people actually violating the law aren’t.

    Trump can pardon them but that comes with an admission of guilt and the inability to hold their jobs.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ok, the last time he violated a judge’s orders, the charges were much more serious and he was facing potential jail time, both from the criminal trial he was a part of and the gag order imposed on him.

    He all-but told the judge to go fuck himself on a daily basis right outside the courtroom, violated the gag order ten fucking times, and received exactly no punishment. And that was when he was a criminal defendant.

    He’s now President of the United States, has all three branches of government in his back pocket, and was basically anointed as a king by the Supreme Court, who declared he’s all but immune from prosecution.

    And this judge thinks he’s going to obey his orders this time? He told you guys to fuck off on the daily when he was a civilian, and y’all did exactly nothing about it. Now he’s POTUS. The fuck is he planning on doing about it now when he violates his orders again? Send out more orders? Trump could literally tell this guy to go fuck himself and his orders with a chainsaw live on television and there’s fuck-all he can do about it.

  • Laser@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Curious if there will be a “straw that broke the camels back” moment with america and this president or is everything he ever does just going to be taken by the public. Im sure the french would have a guillotine out by now

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just wanna know where all the “I need guns to fight back against tyranny” people are. They’re reeeeal quiet.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sure, but there are PLENTY of irresponsible ones screaming that nonsense every time a school shooting happens. It’s not like they’re rare specimens.

            • forrcaho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I know they’re unbelievably dense, and they’re getting their bizzaro worldview reinforced by Fox News every day, but at some point it will be obvious to a critical number of them that they’ve been had; used and tricked and made fools of.

              The whole mind control apparatus that was supposed to keep them in line was keeping their anger on a hair-trigger to short-circuit their critical reasoning faculties and make them atrophy. It worked for a long time, but the consequence is that, once it becomes obvious (even to them) that they’ve been duped, their carefully groomed anger will overflow … and they’ve got an insane number of assault weapons.

      • ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        a not insignificant portion of those people support the current administration. tyranny to them is Dems in control of government.

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Fascism is not exactly sustainable. If not the people or the military, he is bound to piss off someone close to him enough to betray him eventually.

      The issue is how many lives will be lost in the process.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m actually really hoping he doesn’t. It’s better we get this over with sooner than later. Piss the courts and the legislature off before he has gathered enough of a foothold

      • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        i’m actually with you on this one. i’m tired of the dread. let’s get this fucking shit show over with. i need to know if humanity prevails or not. if not, that’s fine. we were an inferior species that deserves whatever we get. it’s just a shame what ecological destruction our downfall is going to wreak. the plants and animals didn’t deserve it.

        i just can’t go on knowing that what we’re living in right now will continue. if it does, we are truly in hell and i must have done something very wrong a long time ago.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          The democracy part was already over when he ignored Congress, this is just accelerating the time period from no longer being a republic to the deciding moments of what will become.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            At this point it’s still just a good attempt at not being a republic. We were, after all, dumb enough to vote this guy in legitimately.

            We’re in the “if you can keep it” phase.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              The President cannot override a law/statute with an executive order it has to go back to the legislature. Trump’s removal of the enforcement teams for their sanctions that were signed legislation was a direct act against the constitution. Every Congress member and senator swears an oath to defend and uphold it. How could we still call it a republic if the representatives decision was illegally overturned and they have not yet removed the executor of it?

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Because it’s been a very short time. It’s still possible laws are enforced, although dangerously precarious.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Also if there is going to be a war, I’d rather it be in my mid 30s than late +. And before my niece and nephews are old enough to l remember it would be nice.

          Also while some media still exists that isn’t fully owned by them

        • burgersc12@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Not sure. Seen it browsing All a handful of times, it is Absolutely Mind Blowing seeing how this all turning out

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        This video is prophetic and I highly encourage everyone to watch it. It sounds like a conspiracy theory except we see virtually all of it happening in front of our own eyes right now.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    So the circus continues. Another day, another contempt-of-decency performance from the executive branch’s greatest hits. McConnell’s ruling isn’t just a legal smackdown—it’s a neon sign flashing “constitutional arson in progress.”

    Funny how “irreparable harm” gets shrugged off like a minor paperwork error. The admin’s playbook? Gaslight, obstruct, project until the courts buckle under sheer audacity. Democracy’s not just teetering—it’s doing backflips off a cliff while they bet on which branch breaks first.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t even need to go that far. The next step after failure to comply with a court order would be dispatching the US Marshalls. They report to the DoJ, so I’d say that’s pretty unlikely.

      Scholars and pundits are saying that act of inhibiting their own accountability will be the official end of the US government as it was designed, and the official beginning of an authoritarian regime.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That’s the trick though. Contempt of court isn’t the same as breaking a law and doesn’t have the same restrictions. For example, a person can be held in jail for contempt indefinitely without trial until the person yields to the demand of the judge. This sometimes happens to people who refuse to pay child support that the courts know they can afford.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think the judge is mistaken. This is an official act. That means it’s not constrained by things like rulings. In fact, law just isn’t applicable. They really should put more effort into staying up-to-date. /s

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, supreme Court already said if it’s an official act, then he is immune. So if he decides a court order but it’s an official act, then he can’t be guilty.

      Great job there scotus

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I get your point, but just because you and your freedom are immune to prosecution doesn’t mean your money and property are safe from seizure. For example, if it’s believed that Mar-a-Lago was used in the process of a crime, like withholding documents or discussing illegal things, then it can be seized in civil asset forfeiture and Trump would have to prove his innocence to get it back. Same with his money. I think it’s possible in the current context to find a judge willing to try this. I have no idea how the execution of such an order would play out. But there are still interesting cards unplayed.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have no idea how the execution of such an order would play out.

          It wouldn’t. The order would get appealed, the appeal would be slow walked so it wouldn’t be executed in a timely manner, and eventually, it would find its way to the supreme kangaroo court and be deemed unconstitutional to seize the assets of the acting president for life.

    • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not saying you’re wrong in your opinion here, but I am gonna ask what happens if Trump does not comply with a federal judge’s order or the order from a state judge that would have implications and federal rulings?

      I think the courts already determined that you can’t prosecute a sitting president, are there no repercussions?

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ya’ll have primed him to ignore your shit because nothing serious has ever happened to him from the courts. You fucking baffoons. Lay in your bed.