I’m a tech interested guy. I’ve touched SQL once or twice, but wasn’t able to really make sense of it. That combined with not having a practical use leaves SQL as largely a black box in my mind (though I am somewhat familiar with technical concepts in databasing).

With that, I keep seeing [pic related] as proof that Elon Musk doesn’t understand SQL.

Can someone give me a technical explanation for how one would come to that conclusion? I’d love if you could pass technical documentation for that.

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Nah, that’s ignoring context irrationally. Context matters. I’ll show.

    He’s not saying “This retard thinks the SSA uses SQL”.

    Can SSA not be called “the government”?

    He is saying “the government” which means all of it.

    So, let’s try your suggested interpretation.

    This retard thinks all the government uses SQL.

    That seems to agree with mine.

    However, you denied ambiguity of language, and that context matters, so let’s explore that: which government? The Brazilian government? Your state government? Your local government? No? How do you know? That’s right: context.

    Why stop there? There’s more context: a Social Security database was specifically mentioned.

    Does “the government” always mean all of it? When a federal agent knocks someone’s door & someone gripes “The goddamn government is after me!” do they literally mean the entire government? I know from context I or anyone else can informally refer to any part of the government at any level as “the government”. I think you know this.

    Likewise, when people refer to the ocean or the sky or the people, they don’t necessarily mean all of it or all of them.

    Another way to check meaning is to test whether a proposition still makes sense when something obvious unstated is explicitly written out.

    This retard thinks the government uses SQL. Why assume they use SQL here?

    Still make sense? Yes. Could that be understood from context without explicitly writing it out? Yes.

    A refrain:

    Use context.