• 🅃🅾🅆🅴🄻🅸🄴@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jokes aside, keep in mind that the idea of fingerprinting is that your computer’s configuration is as unique as a fingerprint (e.g., your monitor is x resolution, you are on this operating system, you are using these following extensions in this browser, you have these fonts on your system).

    Setting your user agent to something super unique is basically shining a spotlight on yourself.

    I recommend this user agent switcher extension (firefox)

    • Huschke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s way worse than that.

      Even if you somehow magically have the same settings as everyone else, you’re mouse movement will still be unique.

      You can even render something on a canvas out of view and depending on your GPU, your graphics driver, etc the text will look different…

      There is no real way to escape fingerprinting.

      • 🅃🅾🅆🅴🄻🅸🄴@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have a novice coding question using the mouse tracking as an example: Is it possible to intercept and replace mouse tracking data with generic inputs? For example, could you implement an overlay that blocks mouse interactions, and instead of physically clicking on elements, send a direct packet to the application to simulate selecting those elements?

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, it’s possible. That’s the way a lot of automated web UI testing tools work. The problem with doing it during normal browser use is that your intentional actions with the real mouse wouldn’t work right, or the page would start acting like you clicked on things you didn’t click on.