• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yea people think he means CDU but given he is literally a fascist grandpa it is more like that he is either confusing CDU with AfD or thinks that AfD has won because of all the ruckus going on

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Jokes on him. What he sees as German conservatives is mostly in line with US Democrats. The German version of the Republicans are the AfD, the Nazi party.

  • Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Notice how Trump considers America to be under him.

    Not just in this text, but in all of his actions as well. He has no intention to be a responsible leader, he intends to rule, and to do so with impunity.

    • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m fairly far left but the strong LINKE might actually fuck us over pretty hard. They are strong enough that they’re able to block increased defense spending together with the AfD in a time where increased national and European security might just be our most existential issue.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They are strong enough that they’re able to block increased defense spending together with the AfD

        Does Germany have some rules that defence spending requires a 2/3rds supermajority or something? Linke and AfD cannot stop anything on their own if a simple majority is required. The Union and SPD have a slim majority between them, and add the Greens and you’ve got an extremely strong majority.

        • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The only way the conservatives get the funding for increased arms manufacturing is by disabling/changing something about the debt ceiling.

          Debt ceiling is in the basic law (constitution), which requires a 2/3 majority to be altered.

          Linke are against the debt ceiling in general, but not if it’s only disabled for military spending while still preventing investments in public infrastructure. I think with a bit of diplomacy and concessions in the wording, Linke can be persuaded here.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Oh yeah I’ve heard some commentators talking about the debt brake before, and how some are pushing to do away with it. It didn’t occur to me that military spending would specifically be the sticking point there.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      The real winners are the leftist party who got 8.7%.

      Probably most of those voters voted SPD or die Grüne before but lost trust. Happened in Belgium too…

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep. SPD lost way more to Union and AfD, though, and the Greens got out of this whole thing relatively unscathed, they have a quite stable basis.

        Fun fact: Die Linke gained more voters from CDU and FDP than they lost to the AfD.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Protest voters be protest voting. Unless what they want is actually achieved they’ll start hopping from party to party, usually in the direction of “this will be the greater middle finger to the establishment”. It’s people who think that kicking their car when it doesn’t start will fix it.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          that’s just people who want change but don’t know what to vote so they just vote for whichever populist politician screams harder

    • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the right-wing CDU/CSU has won and the right-wing AfD is right behind it? These are the fruits of 16 years of Merkel with “We can do it”. It started with her migration policy etc. and the attacks increased but only at times when they wanted to overturn laws or introduce new ones.
      This moved the population to the right. (We can do it… Making Germany right-wing again < that’s how it should have been understood!) So the AfD happen to be former CDU/CSU voters… Germany gave up its sovereignty yesterday.

      Democracy is broken!

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        The “we can do it” part wasn’t the problem, the problem was not backing it up with enough funds for states and municipalities to actually do a proper job. Which is a can of worm of fiscal politics if there ever was one because the reason the states are broke is because the wealth tax got suspended back in 1997. Kohl era shit.

        • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The problem was that Merkel contributed everything to the division. She wanted destability etc. What is the best way to get a country to the right? You flood it with refugees with the aim of dividing it “we can do it” did not refer to managing the refugee situation… ( DE has helped itself that there are so many refugees at all ) But a party can hardly say “we are do it to dismantle democracy in order to impose our own will”.

          https://youtube.com/watch?v=SGD2q2vewzQ

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m schizotypal, I know paranoid narratives when I see them. Get a grip. Touch some grass. Less consumption, more actual engagement with politics. Join Die Linke.

            • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              The video was 15 years ago lol. All the surveillance systems etc. that were implemented afterwards for spy citizen… You could also look at Snowden etc. again. It’s people like you why it’s getting worse. But the main thing is to hide your head in the sand so you don’t notice anything, right?

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Dude I was in the fray, on the ground, when the Pirates were founded. And I wasn’t talking about the video when calling shit paranoid, didn’t even watch it.

                • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Oh, so you belong to the faction that discredits others as aluhut carriers and then years later is completely surprised when the whole shit is suddenly reality. One of the main reasons why it turns out so shitt( And why others started to think the pirates just sucks, because in addition to the kindergarten within the party, voters like you were added. Really, thanks for the shit!) Thank you for trampling on civil rights etc.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        So the AfD happen to be former CDU/CSU voters…

        Not directly. The biggest group of AfD Voters are former non voters. But in terms of voters who migrated to the AfD the biggest group can from the CDU.

    • Whateley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      My elderly relatives type like that when they want to make sure people know they’re very serious people with important opinions about the price of milk and Barack Obama being a secret homosexual.

  • vormadikter@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tell me you dont know shit about the german voting system without telling me you dont know shit about the german voting system.

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do not discredit our supreme leader. His knowledge of the German voting system is equally refined as all his other knowledge.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dude does not understand how german elections work lmao. Nobody won that election, the conservatives got 28% of the vote. There will be at least a 3 party coalition and things could become pretty complicated.

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        88
        ·
        2 days ago

        The “conservative party” is the CDU/CSU, and even though they won, they just had their second worst result since the 1950s.

          • Skydancer@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            44
            ·
            1 day ago

            It shouldn’t. They did so poorly because 10% of the German electorate shifted even farther to the far right AfD, and another 10% had already done so in previous elections.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Don’t confuse the electorate shifting with non-voters turning up to give a finger to the whole system, that’s the AfD’s biggest gain. This shit will continue until rent becomes affordable again or another party manages to capture the same vote.

        • federal reverse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          While in this case, Trump clearly speaks about the party with the largest share, i.e. CxU — it would too make sense for Trump to call Afd “conservatives.” Because that’s the fun equivalence US Republicans use, as even they don’t seem to want to identify as “regressives”.

      • fantasty@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        The (almost extremist) “conservatives” gained like 3 percent points or something since the last election. Plus, they have been in the government for like 80% of the time since WW2. Trump is soooo anti establishment but these guys ARE the most establishment anyone in Germany could be. They are not the solution to people’s problems, they are the ones who caused many of the problems in Germany.

      • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Germans are very much like Americans, they like to Moralize and act like they got their shit together, and pretend like they’re all enlightened, but their people are just as fucked up as Americans sometimes.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          their people are just as fucked up as Americans sometimes.

          I’m tempted to respond with a picture of Nicholas Cage, but then I think about how Holocaust denial is increasing…

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s a win for the party, but a win for the party is different from winning the election.

        In the last Australian federal election, the Greens quadrupled their number of seats. It was absolutely a huge win for the Greens. But going from 0.7% of seats to 2.6% cannot mean you “won” the election. (Also…wow…that shows just how gross single winner elections are. Even with preferential voting. When a party that consistently gets over 10% of the votes is able to win less than 3% of seats and call that a huge win. Proportional systems like Germany’s MMP are amazing!)

        Whether you want to say the CDU/CSU “won” the German election, IMO, depends less on how their vote changed relative to the last election, and more on whether you want to say the party that ends up selecting the Chancellor “won” an election, even if they need to go into a three party coalition. My personal take is that yes, it’s not unreasonable to say they won.

      • Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        They didnt double. Olaf Scholz wasnt elected because he was liked. He and SPD last time got the most votes because media slammed against greens, and the CDU/CSU lies and corruption was layed open. Now people forgot who governed the most time and voted union again

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        AfD (Conservatives Trump was looking for) doubled their vote, but won’t be part of government. Party with the most votes went from 23% to 28%.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            In parliamentary democracies, the “government” is the term used for the ruling party or coalition. Even more specifically, it’s used for the Ministers. It’s a more specific term than just referring to all elected representatives sitting in the parliament (the Bundestag, in the case of Germany, or maybe the Bundestag & Bundesrat). Comparing it to the American system, “government” is somewhat analogous to the “executive”—the President and Cabinet Secretaries—except that it’s a fuzzy term and can also mean the non-ministerial members of parliament who are allied with the ministers.

            So the AfD will not be a part of the Government because both the CDU/CSU and SPD have placed a cordon sanitaire around the AfD. They refuse to work with them because they view them as dangerous extremists. It would be theoretically possible for the CDU/CSU to break that cordon and form a government between just their party and the AfD, or they can form a traffic light coalition with the SPD and Green party. The latter seems more likely, given recent German political history.

          • belastend@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because the actual party with the most votes categorically refused to work with them. Going inti a coalitiin with the 3rd placed SPD will still guarantee the CDU a majority in the Bundestag.

          • boreengreen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Cause they can’t find common ground and form alliances with other parties, to form a majority.

            At least that is how I understood it.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        can you explain your reasoning here?

        The context comment makes much more sense, that this is not a conservative win, and Trump is too dumb to realize that that.

        • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Imagine that your place of work, a sizable but far from monopolistic company, suddenly finds itself with twice the clientele. You now service 20% of the market where before you serviced only 10. How might your boss describe that situation? Because mine would call it a win, with very little coaxing.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Since FDP and BSW didnt make it into the parliament SPD, CDU should be able to form a coalition. Only Problem, the SPD Chancellor candidate announced they dont want to coalate with the CDU. We may see the same Situation as in Austria.

      • umfk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Scholz only said that he personality doesn’t want to do the coalition talks. Someone else from the SPD will do them.

      • Vincent@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        the SPD Chancellor candidate announced they dont want to coalate with the CDU.

        I thought Scholz announced that he would step back since he wouldn’t be able to be chancellor? (If I read the Dutch news right.) Which is something else from blocking a CDU coalition.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If Merz tries to get himself elected without having secured practically all conservative PMs will call for his head, the Churches are going to let themselves be heard, loudly, there’d be a coup within the CDU/CSU faction. They barely followed him in that stunt last time they’re not going to do it when it actually matters.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      This cannot be said enough to Anglosphericals, even the well-informed ones sometimes don’t get it. Under proportional representation, you almost never “win” an election and that’s the point.

      It’s a classic misunderstanding between two political different cultures. I remember once a German state election, I think it was Baden-Würtemberg, where the first-placed party had no friends so the parties #2 and #3 (the Greens were one) formed the government. The Anglo press just did not get it - a “the losers ganged up on the winners”! How could Germans possibly accept this travesty of democracy??! But the second and third parties agreed on more things, and between them they had far more votes! It was arguably more democratic than the outcome of a classic first-past-the-post election in Britain or the USA.

      This silly obsession with winners and losers was why the Tories dominated 20th-century British politics even though Labour and the Liberals often had more support between them. It’s arguably what sunk the UK LibDems’ referendum on electoral reform under the Cameron government. And then a few years later Brexit got 51.9%, which for Brits was obviously a resounding victory so most of the the other 48.1% didn’t even complain about literally losing their EU citizenship. The winner-loser culture goes deep for Anglos but it doesn’t always serve them well.

      • analoghobbyist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve also read that the other parties have stated that they will not form a coalition with th AfD, so Trump’s friends will not have a seat at the table.

        • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, well Merz is a special kind of person so I wouldn’t hold my breath for that promise “not to form a coalition” with the AfD. Let’s see what the next weeks bring.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Don’t kid yourself, the future chancellor and former blackrock executive is very well connected with the capital.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Merz already tried to form a majority for a vote in the parliament with the AfD, just a few weeks ago. There might not be a coalition, but I expect them working together.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      He doesn’t understand how they do government in America, and he’s in charge of it.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who is the “GENTLEMAN NAMED DONALD J. TRUMP”? I know of no such person. I know who Donald J. Trump is, but he is most certainly not a “gentleman” by any definition I’m familiar with.

  • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately, our projected future chancellor is very similar to Trump in certain aspects, especially rhetorics and spitting bullshit, then being utterly incompetent when asked specifics.

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like every other narcissist, he makes good news from others all about him. He’s so insecure, he can’t be anywhere but in the spotlight.