• Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Russian interference” is not just a few hackers breaking into emails—it’s a well-documented, multi-decade strategy of disinformation designed to weaken democratic institutions. The Kremlin has spent years building an extensive network of fake social media accounts, bot farms, and propaganda outlets to spread divisive narratives.

    The Senate Intelligence Committee, the FBI, and cybersecurity experts have all confirmed that Russia’s influence campaigns exploit social and political fractures, using platforms like Facebook and Twitter to push misleading or outright false information. Reports from organizations like the RAND Corporation and Stanford Internet Observatory show how these tactics are designed to erode trust in democracy itself, making people more susceptible to authoritarian and extremist messaging.

    This isn’t just speculation—it’s the exact playbook used in Russia’s interference in the 2016 and 2020 elections, as confirmed by U.S. intelligence agencies and the Mueller Report. The goal has always been to amplify distrust, push conspiracy theories, and create a populace that can no longer distinguish fact from fiction.

    And now? We’re seeing the results. A country where misinformation spreads faster than the truth, where people take social media posts at face value instead of questioning their sources, and where a populist leader can ride that wave of disinformation straight into power.

    Putin doesn’t need to fire a single shot—he’s watching Americans tear themselves apart over lies his operatives helped plant. And the worst part? Many people still refuse to acknowledge it’s happening.

    Putin has long stated that Russia is at war with the West—not through traditional military means, but through information warfare. Intelligence agencies, cybersecurity experts, and independent researchers have repeatedly warned that we are being targeted. Yet, many in the West refused to take it seriously.

    Now, we’re losing the war—not on the battlefield, but in the minds of our own citizens, as propaganda and disinformation tear at the very fabric of democracy.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We need to be able to identify their tactics when we see them.

      I’ve personally noticed that there’s a certain kind of user who will always reply no matter what. I think it’s part of their job to never concede so it looks like they’ve won when people on the other side move on with their lives.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Great to see liberals have fully embraced Qanon style conspiracy theory: just spewing out paragraphs of unsourced claims about a grand conspiracy.

      And now? We’re seeing the results. A country where misinformation spreads faster than the truth

      You heard it here folk! How could Americans possibly believe misinformation over truth! There’s no president for it! It must be a foreign scheme! Fluoride in the water! Precious bodily fluids!

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    All it took was a few insatiably greedy assholes and a few decades. Hopefully the next government can figure out how to contend with human greed.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes and the propaganda helped too. The billionaires in the US figured out how to get control of most of the media. It’s a master class for the billionaires of the rest of the world. I imagine it won’t take long for everyone else to start seeing that kind of propaganda as well.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Because of one simple reason: “Don’t care as long as I get mine’s”, personified in Trump, fueled by the increasing disdain those that have wealth and power have had for their neighbors such that the don’t mind living surrounded by shit because they feel they already are.

  • Gewoonmoi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    I feel a ton of sympathy for the besieged Ukrainians. But it does feel good to see the Russians give it to the US war machine after 17 months of the US funding, arming and enabling the most gruesome Israeli crimes against the occupied Pal’s.

      • Gewoonmoi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Villain-face Matthew Miller standing there with a smirk while defending and excusing Israel’s atrocities was much dumber.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The people who will suffer from this are Ukrainians and Palestinians, the rich Americans who have spent decades benefiting from the US’ hegemony will continue being rich without feeling the repercussions of the current administration’s actions. The only Americans who will noticeably suffer from this are the ones who have already been suffering for a long time: Minorities, women, the poor, etc.

      • Gewoonmoi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Trump’s destruction of diplomatic rules of the game is real, but the Democrats helped pave the way by funding, arming and defending Israel’s atrocities in Gaza and beyond.

    • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      USA has hell to pay with nobody who will save them. They deserve 10 times what happend in gaza, iraq and afganistan

  • LePoisson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump is 100% a Russian asset, wild to see that after it was blatantly obvious the first go around we were like “yeah let’s out a Russian spy back in the white house.”

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The important point isn’t even whether or not he is a Russian asset. He undoubtedly is, but that doesn’t actually matter. All that matters is that he’s acting like a Russian asset. He’s doing all the things a Russian asset would do. Ultimately, whether the orders are actually coming from Putin is irrelevant, because the end result is still the same.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Judging how Russian elites started licking up to Trump, even blurring out the Soviet emblems in old movies recently in cinema (that’s really unexpected), and that general “master is our friend, master will forgive us”, it seems that Russia is Trump’s asset.

      You are forgetting how much power the US and every powerful person in it have. Russia is simply not on the same level, USSR might have been once.

      Still, that they are in a relationship is obvious.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’m not forgetting. It’s just that Russia is clearly dictating some major USA foreign policy and was from 2016 to 2020 as well.

        Obviously it’s not black and white, the world is full of gray, but just looking at it through a realpolitik lens the USA is squandering our international goodwill. It may be at the negotiating table and the UN, ceding territorial control via soft power (ie: blowing up USAID which is an idea so retarded it’s embarrassing) that gave us access to resources and good will for where we stick all our military bases, letting Russia dictate terms on the surrender of Ukraine, talking about pulling out of NATO (also insane) and at least working at odds with it… Etc.

        Sorry for the run on sentence.

        Anyways I’m just saying sure some Russian elites are also stroking off Trump at times but that’s just window dressing. If anything they’re doing it because Trump is so incredibly egotistical he can be easily manipulated by pretending to care more about him. That and they want to use him to help launder money and assets (see: cryptocurrency and real estate deals).

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Sorry, but about Trump’s clearly seen NPL - not only Russia is doing it, but also Argentina under Milei, you are not going to argue Trump is Milei’s puppet, I hope. Nobody wants to piss off a narcissist at the top of the US simply because it’s going to be expensive if nothing else.

          I think the reason Americans love to see Russia as something that strong is because of the Cold War, Russia is not USSR even remotely.

          Also I often write alarmist things about Ukraine’s situation at the frontlines, but right now they say it’s a draw. Capitulation is not something they’ll discuss because there’s no need.

          And everybody already knew that the US can elect any idiot.

    • Wren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Half the country have always been aware of it, but are powerless to stop it, the other half either voted for him because of it- or are in complete denial that it’s happening- right before their eyes.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      What you are saying is that the president of the most powerful country in the world, that spend 10 times more in war than russia, that run the biggest surveillance network ever seen in history, that has thousand of military infrastructures around the planet and that has the most technological advanced army in the world is 100% a russian asset…

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is obviously subjective and depends how you define “asset”.

        If you’re asking whether Trump is a red sparrow recruited as a orphan and trained in espionage, ballet, and martial arts from the age of 4, that’s obviously not the case.

        If you’re asking whether Trump is easily manipulated by his desire for validation from competitors, or his desire to exert power over others, then that’s obviously true.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          If you’re asking whether Trump is easily manipulated by his desire for validation from competitors, or his desire to exert power over others, then that’s obviously true.

          Then expect him to be manipulated by the richest people on earth not just by russian

          • glitchdx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Then expect him to be manipulated by the richest people on earth not just by russian

            both are true. This is not mutually exclusive.

            • index@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Indeed but it happens USA has 10 times the bilionares russia has. India has more billionares imagine claiming USA president is controlled by india

              • glitchdx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                imagine using your brain and looking at reality as it is actually playing out. Based on your previous comment, I thought that included you.

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  This is all BlueAnon conspiracy theorists have when you actually press them on their insanity: catty insults

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. I think that he might push back at times for appearance sake but his foreign policy is basically just “do what’s good for Russia.”

          • LePoisson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            I know it doesn’t just boil down to Ukraine, take the situation in Syria for a good example of Trump towing the Russian line during his first term in office.

            So then are you telling me this as a way to make it even more surprising and crazy that Trump and his admin constantly side with Russia?

            • index@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              24 hours ago

              The US and Russia side together when it benefit their authoritarian goals, see the case of Snowden getting stuck in russia because USA said so or look at the silence in general concerning global surveillance: russia never spoke a word about it because they also have their own surveillance and they don’t want the public to know about it.

              What do you think the US does with the biggest army in the world? Are all their warplanes getting dust in hangars?

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    The president grovels to putin: This is an unprecedented loss of u.s. soft power and the world is judging America for it’s cowardice.

    The president, congress and every major media organization grovels to netanyahu: …

    This does look bad on our part but the main thing making us look bad on the world stage is our support for Israel. If you ask the average person outside of the west what they find most offensive about this administration they’ll probably say its genocidal policy in gaza, not it’s shakedown of an ally.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Maybe, but that’s a small amount of countries / people. Mostly Taiwan and to a far lesser extent south Korea and Japan. Most other countries aren’t threatened by China, and the few that are aren’t allied enough with the u.s. to plan there defense around u.s. support.

        Meanwhile the Israeli genocide has brought together the large swaths of the Muslim world with progressive anti colonial movements in the global south against Israel and the u.s.

        The world isn’t just the u.s. and its allies. Most people live in countries outside that political sphere, though most within it tend to forget that.

        • Saryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          You are vastly underestimating the number of countries and people that feel threatened by China. It’s a huge country that is pushing its grievances and interests in virtually every direction it can. The list of targetted countries includes Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan (Republic of China/ROC), Vietnam, Bhutan, India, Japan, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Singapore…and more

          • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            You missed the:

            and the few that are, aren’t allied enough with the u.s. to plan there defense around u.s. support

            None of those besides taiwan, japan and maybe Philippines are or should be planning there defense around u.s. support. The u.s. has no policy or interest in supporting a war over the south China sea.

            Also Myanmar is more focused on there own civil war then any threats from China or the message this interview gave. If they were so threatened, they wouldn’t have allowed China to be a mediator to end the conflict.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It wasn’t intentional. Trump followed Putin just as Vance followed Trump. He is just too stupid to have seen how this would play out.

    Getting attacked by a foreign leader is such an effective way to rally your people behind you, that governments often fabricate external threats as a way to unify their nation. Putin knew the ways this could play out. The only more desirable result for Putin would’ve been Zelenskyy reluctantly accepting the agreement, but globally discrediting the US was a guarantee.

    Putin was a KGB intelligence officer for 16 years before going to work for Yeltsin. The man outsmarts intelligence experts for fun. Trump’s ignorance and ego make him the perfect patsy, and the greedy Republicans in office have fully manifested into spineless yes men that are guaranteed to stay out of his way.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      2 days ago

      Putin is not some 4D Chess master. This should be blatantly obvious since 2022. But he does not need to be what you make him out, all he needs to be is a little bit smarter than the orange idiot.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I remember the first time I started to pay attention to geopolitics. It was when George W. Bush was elected president, and it made me freak out a bit. Why would a country like America elect such an obvious idiot to the highest office?

        I also remember that Putin in comparison seemed like an intelligent, sensible person, even if tad intimidating.

        I’m not sure what my point is except that George W. is a genius compared to Trump.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          It wasn’t too long ago, we thought palin is batsht insane and stupid,she still is but ?

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Of course. I wasn’t praising him, but comparing his experience in political manipulation to Trump’s. MAGA isn’t any better, taking Putin’s word that he’d “much rather have Biden or Harris in the White House” than Trump.

  • StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    Another big winner here is China. I would love to know the contents of that meeting between putin and xi, I think back in 2022(?)

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    It wasn’t disinformation - it is a pedophile who had minors delivered into his bed and was filmed during the atrocities. The resulting child pornography is what makes orange guy the lap dog of a psychotic killer.

    The rest was easy with an asset that high in the ranks.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 days ago

      Could be. It could also just be bribes.

      The current situation is really nice for countries like Russia, Saudi-Arabia and China. They just need to pay a few billion to Trump and get stuff that cannot be bought and are easily worth hundreds of billions from the US empire.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Their new crypto grifts really take this to an extreme level. Hundreds of millions just directly given to Trump as bribes now, its actually insane.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        It could be either of those things certainly, but I feel like no amount of money Russia could provide would be enough for Trump, he’s in control of the United States Treasury and can direct money anywhere with impunity (see also: Starlink). If they came out with a video he’d just call it fake - particularly in this age of AI - and it would have zero effect.

        Russians throw people out windows all the time though. I’d be willing to bet that the threat of physical harm is all that is necessary to control him.

        Or quite possibly, all three things. Keep us happy and the money keeps flowing, the porn stays in the vault and you won’t be unalived.

        One thing is certain: it’s not nothing.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Russia doesn’t care, as long as there’s division in the west, and they have achieved in many countries already

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It was mostly disinformation though, if you look at how most of the social media, and MSMs ran, it’s mostly talking points from Russia in some form another

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      And at this point, who cares? Tell the CIA what blackmail Putin has on you. That’s what they’re there for.

      Don’t sell out your whole gd country and the world because you’re just that desperate to hide your personal crimes.

      What a moron.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because once you give into blackmail, that just opens to door to further blackmail. And every single time you give in, it makes it worse and worse. At this point, yeah Trump could get his base to arm wave away him fucking minors. But then he’d have to explain away every thing he’s done for them since then, which is just treasonous.

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You know, I can easily imagine the first part opening a lot of peoples eyes about Trump if they saw it on it’s own. Add the second part and they are likely to throw it into the flat-earth bucket of statements.

    I really wonder how much of the current situation in the US is because people would rather be smug and gloat over people with different politics then actually try to convince them.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t normalize imperialistic ambitions as a way to appeal to fascists. Ukraine should be supported, but not because of the need to maintain the hegemony.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        So in response to my argument that you shouldn’t directly encourage imperialism you’re arguing “but my empire is better than their empire.” How very… insightful. I understand that you believe imperialism is a fundamental reality of international politics, but it’s only because of tact shit like this that defeats internationalism.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Well, “my empire is better” is a very good argument when discussing which empire should run the world.

          There’s only 3 choices for who gets the hegemony right now, or is my knowledge out of date? There’s USA, China, and Russia.

          Curious who should take over if Americans should let go.

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Let me give you an overview of our argument so far.

            • I made a comment that the original language encourages a false dichotomy that justifies imperialism.

            • You replied that there are only options that allow imperialism.

            • I replied that’s a false dichotomy.

            • You replied they’re the only options.

            In the meantime we’ve got the history non-aligned movement and the history of imperial ambitions being inherently self destructive and leading to fundamental overreach that destroys the very states that attempt them because they start to believe that absolute nonsense that you seem to. The frank truth is, neither the US, Russia, or China are CAPABLE of being a true hegemony. All three of them have serious issues even maintaining their own internal cohesion. Internationalism is the only rational path forward and these “realpolitik” takes are fundamentally a delusion derived from empires believing their own propaganda. Encouraging imperialist rhetoric is what allows fascists to thrive and results in idiotic interventionalism.

            Ukraine should be supported because Russia is acting in an imperialistic manner, not because America has some danger of losing an ephemeral imperial power that it doesn’t have in the first place.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    “No country in history” is a pretty bold claim. Surely Britain ceding India for example would be a counterexample, just off the top of my head.

    But honestly, uh, good? I don’t want the US acting as global hegemon. The power and influence wielded by the nation-state only goes to benefitting the rich and powerful. It doesn’t benefit ordinary people in any way, whether domestically or abroad.

    I don’t know why it’s assumed that heading a global empire is supposed to be a good thing, it certainly doesn’t align with my values as a leftist.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Britain didn’t give it up out of the random whims of its government. India functionally became ungovernable. This isn’t anywhere near the same thing.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, there’s an idea. So it can’t really be said to be “willfully given up” on a “random whim” if a military force is preventing you from exerting control over a given region.

        In that case, I do have just a couple of notes for OP.