fossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-21 年前fuck thismander.xyzimagemessage-square676fedilinkarrow-up12.17Kfile-text
arrow-up12.17Kimagefuck thismander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-21 年前message-square676fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLetstakealook@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up114·1 年前Ah! But it says “congress shall make no law,” not that “the president shall tweet no bullshit!”
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·1 年前tbh, the founding fathers did fuck this up quite bad, by not including this
minus-squareContramuffin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 年前The constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law” Rookie mistake, IMO
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 年前It literally did, minus your contemporary idiom: he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, (It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.) Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 年前It was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 年前Second. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.
Ah! But it says “congress shall make no law,” not that “the president shall tweet no bullshit!”
tbh, the founding fathers did fuck this up quite bad, by not including this
The constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law”
Rookie mistake, IMO
It literally did, minus your contemporary idiom:
(It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.)
Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
It was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
Second. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.