Reddit says the “vast majority” of users won’t be affected.
  • commander@lemmings.worldEnglish
    6·
    3 hours ago

    People get mad over government censorship, but condone corporate censorship if it’s something they want censored.

    • Dr. Zoidberg@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      3 hours ago

      Going against an agreement you agreed to abide by is not censorship. If you don’t like the agreement, don’t agree to it.

      • commander@lemmings.worldEnglish
        5·
        1 hour ago

        Agreeing to be censored doesn’t mean you’re not being censored.

        Lol. The pro-censorship crowd really is a sight to behold. Glad I’m not loyal to it!

        • Dr. Zoidberg@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 hours ago

          If you wanna continue to be a fucking moron, that’s on you, doesn’t change the fact that if you agree to not do something, and you do it, there are consequences.

          But keep bitching because you’re too stupid to know what a TOS is, and the consequences of breaking a TOS you agree to, because you’re too stupid to read.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 hour ago

        It’s not illegal for the other party to include it, but it is absolutely censorship by any definition of the word.

        • Dr. Zoidberg@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 hour ago

          If you’re stupid, yes. If you have half a brain, it’s not.

          If you play in the MLB and take steroids, you get suspended, and if you keep taking steroids, you get a lifetime suspension. Steroids aren’t illegal. That’s not censorship. It’s breaking the rules and facing the consequences of breaking the rules.

          If you’re stupid and think facing consequences for breaking a rule you agreed to is censorship, that’s on you for being stupid.