Even if it landed correctly, why would they plan a solar powered mission to the moon when our next lunar eclipse is in like 5 days?

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Quite true. Strangely, here on Earth they have smart robots that you can literally kick over sideways, and their sensors and hydraulics and stuff kick right in and set them back upright.

      If you’re gonna dump hundreds of millions of dollars into such a project, why not utilize all known, available, and proven technology?

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Weight. That’s the only actual answer.

        It’s extremely expensive to send weight to the moon, everything you list is more weight.

          • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            You’re looking at it with hindsight. Sure it feels like spending another million $ designing, testing, and adding additional weight, along with removing weight from other parts looks like the right decision now.

            Every design makes compromises, and every failure looks stupid when looking at the end result. The team had decisions to make and if they had the extra time and money, then making the existing design more robust with more testing and reliability would have been the better solution.