• MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stallman from FSF would probably say only if the software is updateable. Firmware which can’t be changed is no different from hardware. I kind of agree, even though he said that about open source. But the point still stands. If printer can’t be used without account or always online or ink. Then it’s a feature. Whether you agree with it or not, vote with your wallet. However if they hide the feature that’s misleading advertising and it’s a different crime all together.

        But what HP tried to do is to send over the air update that prevented printers from using recycled toner. Now that’s a bitch move.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By itself there is nothing immoral in software lock, but the way it is used here is immoral. It is common understanding and expectation that the scanner should work if there is no ink, thus locking scanner is doggy technique. Locking printer if you do not have ink, however, is totally fine, since it prevents printer damage.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a legit use of DRM/software lock if HP gives you the printer to use (for free) when you buy some ink, but they’re charging for it and the ink.

        It’s function theft.