• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t know why you would think tha assessment has any credibility. You aren’t going to know what they have and frankly that isn’t relevant to taxation as we don’t tax wealth.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Why? We don’t assess anyone’s wealth because that’s insanely hard to do and is why every wealth tax that gets adopted eventually gets dropped.

        What right do we have to know what a foreign nation, which the Vatican is, has?

        Why would you want government workers to decide what is and is not acceptable for a Church? This is literally why the Congregationalists moved to Plymouth.

        • PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          My point is that, in the US, other organizations that accept charity have to produce documentation detailing their spending. Religious organizations should be held to the same standard.

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Because those things are related. If you don’t spend all your revenue, you end up accumulating wealth - that’s profit. Which is directly in contradiction of being a nonprofit entity.

              • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Profit is the revenue you have left after your expenses. Profits can become wealth but wealth is not profits.

                If you can’t understand the above you should be asking questions more than making definitive statements.

                • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The fact that you think this contradicts what I said really speaks to your reading ability.

                  Profits can become wealth

                  Is the same as what I said

                  you end up accumulating wealth

                  Now go be incorrectly pedantic somewhere else.

                  • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    The wealth a church has can be derived from gifts which aren’t revenue and aren’t profits. For example when my local bishop died he gave the diocese his collection of first edition theological texts. Those books have value and this are wealth but zero profit is gained by having them because they aren’t being sold.

                    At no point was I “incorrectly pedantic” you seem to just not know the difference between wealth and profits which is odd considering the claims you have made about your academic background.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          This is literally why the Congregationalists moved to Plymouth.

          A bit disingenuous. They also didn’t want to be persecuted while having batshit insane ideas and did horrible persecution, even unto death and torture of others, unless I’m misremembering. Churches should not be allowed to persecute nor encourage persecution of others. It would be nice if they actually taught the whole Bible in a sane and honest way and let God do the judging.