• pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I had and endless argument with some someone about this a while ago here’s how it works (in my opinion) wetness is not a fundamental property of water instead wetness is having water on or inside something so a towel is wet when it has water in it. But a singular water particle by itself is not wet because it is not surrounded by water but most water is wet because they are all surrounded by other water particles.

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Is water a collection of H2O particles but not a H2O particle by itself?

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        A particle of water may be surrounded by water but when we talk about water we’re usually referring to a body of water like that in a glass or pot rather than one particle thereof.

        Is the water in that glass wet? No. The glass is wet.

        A room can be “airy” but the air in that room is not “airy”.

        A car can be painted but paint is not painted.

        … and so on and so forth.

          • pineapple@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That is a really good point, by saying water isn’t wet you are also saying that water is dry.

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I disagree if there is paint on the paint which there would be unless the paint is 1 particle thick then the paint has been painted. I don’t know what airy means so I can’t comment on that though.