• Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 个月前

    Yet others are not reading it that way, so maybe there are multiple people who are just skimming over what I said to find what they want to go in on.

    I appreciate you clarifying your original comment.

    Or do you rather mean that the insights obtained while developing LLMs can help us towards those better machine learning applications?

    Yes, exactly this. I don’t think the future technology we have both fantasized about is just a beefed up chat gpt, but that the field of machine learning as a whole will advance and LLMs are a part of that process.

      • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        Thanks for apologizing.

        I definitely understand where you are coming from, although I do think there is a Luddite-esque angle that attempts to reject “AI” as bad because of the LLM hype and the negative uses pushed by capitalists. “AI” is already putting people out of work and being used in a lot of industries, some of which (like medicine) are actually really promising, and others are pretty terrible.

        Either way, ending capitalism is the only way to ensure that there is any future where the technology is a net positive.

        I do think that with the rate of climate collapse, there’s a good chance we won’t see it reach the point of being advanced enough to be liberating.