• molten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 days ago

    Remember: misinformation comes from both sides. Just because you like it doesn’t mean you can skip fact checking.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      5 days ago

      Simply using the term “both sides” is problematic, and not just because it’s a binary fallacy. There aren’t just two sides. It’s misrepresents a system in which there is one single, unified group that engages in violent, oppressive, lawless fascism… and then there is everyone else, covering a nearly infinite variety of ideologies and goals, and many of whom have no representation.

      The phrase “both sides” as it is, itself, misinformation and propaganda.

      • molten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        5 days ago

        Let me clarify. I’m an imbecile who normally comments on porn and trash memes. I didn’t put much thought into it besides “PSA: we’re inclined to believe things that align with us! Make sure to check!” Because I gotta remind myself often because I believe most things I like. and think people also might appreciate being reminded. I just think too often in binary terms because (see above) I’m an idiot and it’s all easier that way. But I’m always trying to grow and do better so I’ll take your critique of my comment to heart.

        I guess I’ll try to phrase things less binarily in the future. Or keep it short. But thanks for keeping me on it.

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          4 days ago

          God damn, this is an awesome level headed comment.

          I like that you are BOTH right.

          “Both sides” has definitely changed in meaning. Every time I read it I just assume it’s some right wing dipshit trying to muddy the waters.

          Your point is totally valid though, misinformation comes and can come from anywhere, especially online.

          Keep up the good work both of you!

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I don’t need to give MAGA the benefit of the doubt anymore.

      They lost that privilege years and years ago.

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The side that is doing actually good stuff doesn’t need to use misinformation, but there’ll be unaffiliated people spreading whatever kind they want on a platform that will have them

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    5 days ago

    The timeline in the article doesn’t line up with that picture.

    Sounds like there was a nasty divorce in 2015 between the parents, including a restraining order.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      5 days ago

      We’ve got an article, I’m sure there will be more coming out. It’s his mom and stepdad:

      Social media accounts for his parents show that his dad, a U.S. Army veteran, and his mom, a pet groomer, have each divorced and remarried. Each has made Facebook posts in support of President Donald Trump and right-wing politics, but there is no indication their son shares their views.

      https://www.thedailybeast.com/wess-roley-identified-as-man-accused-of-killing-idaho-firefighters/

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        5 days ago

        Per the CNN story, its certainly possible he had a mental break after failing to get a job in the forestry service and just decided to take it out on a couple of firefighters before offing himself.

        Did his parents holding extremist political views and a fetish for firearms play a role in his actions? Would be more unbelievable if they didn’t. But I don’t think he’d have been better off with a couple of parents who were firmly in the Ted Cruz camp or disaffected Liz Cheney die-hards, either.

        If I was to take a wild guess, I’d say this was the direct result of a kid who was out of high school, unemployed, with no real future on the horizon, who was terminally online in a community of (likely a large number of bot-accounts and trolls) telling him he’s worthless and should just off himself.

        A classic problem of “surplus males” that plague every militant reactionary society.

        • fantacyde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          I appreciate this take on it. So easy to take jabs at the MAGA family but to take the time to really think on the more actual influences on this kid’s actions, I think you did well.

  • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    too bad this happened in the home of the Aryan Nation, it’ll amount to thoughts and prayers

    I truly hope firefighters nationwide make some noise against this shit with guns and mental health and press politicians to make changes via inaction during emergencies. this is absolutely fucking unacceptable and they should not ever fear additional life threatening forces while risking their lives and addressing crises

    so fucking tired of psychos parading around their love of guns alongside their hatred. your god isn’t fuckin real, your guns are not a “god given right”

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      your god isn’t fuckin real, your guns are not a “god given right”

      Jesus would be going temple pharisee rampage and shoving their guns up their asses

      • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Jesus would be going temple pharisee rampage and shoving their guns up their asses

        Bible v2.0, now with 100% more guns in poopers

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why are you doxxing people? I get it, they like trump, fuck them. But ultimately putting blame on the parents and showing their faces is fucked.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      130
      ·
      5 days ago

      Are you serious right now? We live in a time of mass strife brought on by the redcaps. If you dont want your face and name on the internet dont support fascism.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          124
          ·
          5 days ago

          it’s not “doxxing” when they posted that photo themselves voluntarily. especially since there’s no home address, work address, phone number, etc. they obviously want the world to know they’re maga. and now the world does.

          fuck them

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          75
          ·
          5 days ago

          They are sending their masked goons to kidnap people. They should not sleep safe or soundly. I’ll make sure to feed your high horse when they come for you.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ah yes so the best way to handle that is to doxx parents of a murderer because they are MAGA. That will show the government!

            All you are doing is stooping down to their level and using their tactics against people who didn’t have anything to do with the situation other than the fact of “they had a kid”.

            • daisy lazarus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              4 days ago

              If you’re MAGA, you endorse Jan 6 and support a convicted felon to lead the world.

              Fuck MAGA.

              Fuck these two—in spite of their alleged murderer son.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                You don’t commit crimes against people because “they support maga”. Otherwise what you are doing is legitimizing them committing crimes against you, because you aren’t maga. Let the courts handle this, not public opinion, and defo not public opinion aimed at the parents of the perp.

                • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Crimes were not committed against the parents. There is no gag order on publicly posted info. If they receive threats as a result, THEN a crime will have occurred: it is illegal to make threats.

                • daisy lazarus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  My point was that their proud wearing of MAGA caps, in my view, renders them deplorable even if their child’s killing spree was not in any way their fault. (Which, come on, it almost certainly is.)

                  Fuck them in spite of him.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Off of wikipedia - it is an act of publically providing personally identifiable information about an individual without their consent

            1. There is their face - personally identifiable
            2. There is “these are the parents of a murderer” which is the additional information.

            And if you read up on the article you will know that “aggregation from public databases and social media” counts too.

            It may be carried out for reasons such as online shaming (…)

            So yeah, this is 100% doxxing, so save me your “oh you don’t know what it means” spiel.

            • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Wow, some folks really do have trouble with the concept of cause and effect, don’t they? They gave consent when they publicly posted the pics online.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                No, they didn’t give consent to have their names and faces shown publicly to people like you who would shame them for the crime of having a kid that grew up and commited murder.

                • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Actually they did when they posted their names and photos publicly to the internet. “Public” doesn’t mean only the people that you like.

                  Edit: Additionally, I find your “people like you” statement hilarious. You know nothing about me, you’re upset that these parents were publicly identified, and you assume my motivations (completely incorrectly.) When something is PUBLICLY posted, that means there are NO restrictions on who sees it. Consent is not qualified by “oh I posted it publicly but not for this group of people I don’t like.” Public means everyone. Had they posted it PRIVATELY, you’d have an argument. But they did not, so you don’t have a valid argument, you’re just upset. There’s a difference between the two.

    • jhoff90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      His own parents had no contact orders against him after he made numerous threats on their lives. He was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon. He posted radicalized ideas and conspiracy theories on his X account.

      Trumpism is both a disease and a mental disorder, and ignoring your deranged kid because he’s too difficult to handle and who obviously has some F***ed up ideas about the world is pretty messed up on their behalf.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Okay, so?

        Does that mean they shouldn’t have protective orders out? What should they be doing, forcefully trying to insert themselves into a situation where they are in danger and the kid has shown multiple times he isn’t interested / is actually threatening?

        This to me makes it even more fucked up that their faces are being shown like this online.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            How is OP “trying to hide” anything? Saying we shouldn’t aggregate and publish PII about the parents of a terrorist who have sought legal protection from that person isn’t “trying to hide” anything, it’s pleading for others to prevent harassment. There’s zero evidence that the parents have anything to do with this and some evidence of the opposite, yet the OP is trying to create a link because they share political opinions with the current administration.

            I get it, I strongly dislike Trump and have since I saw him in the primaries back in the 2010s, and I would like nothing more than for every bad thing to be legitimately caused by him and his ideas. But that’s not the case, and that doesn’t mean every crazy person with a gun was somehow corrupted by parents who likely voted for Trump.

            It’s much more likely that the parents did their best to teach the kid respect for first responders (conservatives tend to have a hard-on for police and firefighters), guns, etc, and the kid stumbled onto a manipulative online community at just the wrong time in his life (say, a messy divorce) and that corrupted him. Or maybe it’s a classic case of schizophrenia. Idk, but I’m pretty sure his parents’ political beliefs are unrelated. This could’ve happened to a family with progressive views who also happen to like guns, I knew plenty of those growing up.

            • tiny_iota@endlesstalk.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I think most peoples attitudes towards trumpies being ‘doxxed’ is circumstance. For instance I can make the case that trump voters doxxed every single muslim in the US of A by saying he’d ban them, or the central park 5–even after they were proven innocent–or people of Mexican descent for being rapists. And then voting for the hate filled sack. So its ok to dox the masses but not individuals? How many mass shootings have happened because of that? How many untold number of those minorities were turned town jobs or shunned by society because Trump came down that elevator and said they were ‘bad hombres’?

              What goes around comes around is what I think the saying is? Maybe that’s why no one shedding any tears for these folks? Just my two cents. But I don’t think anyone should feel this way, its all driven by politics.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I can make the case that trump voters doxxed every single muslim in the US of A by saying he’d ban them

                That’s not doxxing though. Doxxing means deanonymizing an individual by publicly revealing personally identifiable information about them. Saying, “you should hate this group because X, Y, and Z” isn’t doxxing unless you also provide PII about the individuals in that group, it’s “just” hate speech.

                But I don’t think anyone should feel this way, its all driven by politics.

                Agreed. Hating someone because of group affiliation is always bad, whether that’s a racial or political group.

                Do you really want to live in a society where it’s acceptable to hate someone based purely on who they voted for? I sure don’t. I’ve met good and bad people across the political spectrum, so judging people based on party affiliation is a terrible way to go about things.

                I’m absolutely on board with protesting Trump and his policies, I’m not on board with jumping on people because they voted for the guy.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You are putting their faces in the public to hundreds / thousands of people, telling them “go hate these people”. Yes, it is doxxing. This will lead to crazies harassing them. You can also reverse image search them to directly find them.

        • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s reverse image searchable in part because you can also search “Wess Roley parents” and it’s right there.

          The ‘that isn’t already public’ part of my comment is kinda important- this information and this image is already public, so posting it isn’t doxxing anyone.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            As I said multiple times - doxxing can use public databases and social media to gather that information. Read the wikipedia definition, it is right there.

            Imagine a vtuber posting a photo on their private facebook. Then their neighbors grabbing that photo, knowing they are said vtuber, going to the fandom, linking the photo as “this is the vtuber, they live at XYZ”. Would you still go “oh that’s not doxxing, they posted their faces on the internet that one time!”? Of course you wouldn’t.

    • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      In phycology it’s usually the parents that fuck their kids up. I see it all the time. If they had turbulent marriage then the kid had a turbulent life.

      From CNN

      “Court documents show that Roley had a tumultuous family life growing up. His mother filed for divorce in September 2015, when her son was 10 years old, and wrote in court documents that her husband had threatened her, pushed her to the ground, and “punched several holes in the walls.”

      “He threatened to sit outside my house with a sniper rifle or burn my house down,” she wrote.

      A judge granted a protective order preventing Roley’s father from having contact with his wife or son, but later amended the order to remove the son after his father wrote in a court filing that “I am not a danger to my son or anyone else” and that his wife “did not tell the truth in her statement.”

      The divorce was granted in November 2015, and Roley’s mother was designated as his “primary residential parent.”

      Sometimes the kids are just dicks though.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    We need your particular set of skills to kidnap and possibly deflate a giant orange balloon that people keep pretending is human.

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        By “propaganda” I mean lies and manipulation. By definition you can’t consent to that.

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think they probably have a dull little voice in the back of their head that they do their best to starve and keep locked in a little prison cell that tells them they shouldn’t believe what they’re seeing/hearing, and they ignore the voice and keep consuming Faux News etc.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Propaganda is self reinforced as much as it is externally reinforced, it’s a lot like a barbed arrow that dogs in the more you try to remove it. Sure there are some who can just rip it out with raw willpower, but most victims require anothers help. Problem is most don’t see themselves as a victim of propaganda.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              It doesn’t get better by killing firefighters. There is absolutely a small set of horrible people that the world would be much, much, much better off without.

  • KiloGex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Do we really need to spread fake info about this? His parents had an aggressively hostile divorce 10 years ago.

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      So neither exist? No one raised him?.. My money is on at least one of them is his parent…the other probably played a part in raising him.

      • KiloGex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        Mom raised him. Dad barely saw him. But in any case, these clearly aren’t his parents because like I said they were divorced before MAGA was a thing. This is just a troll posting a picture of some idiots hoping that people will give them Internet points.