• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7日前

    How is it licensed, Jigsaw? Eh? What distro is it from? Is that a fucking Snap wheel?

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7日前

        What I hadn’t anticipated in my 20 years away from Linux was not only had teams of unpaid volunteers been beavering away behind the scenes to make everything work better, other much more enthusiastic teams have been thinking up new and exciting ways to break it again.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7日前

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as wheel, is in fact, GNU/Wheel, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus wheel.

  • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    7日前

    The wheel has had a number of innovations over the years. The earliest wheels were flat disks of wood that were heavy and slow turning. The Romans invented spokes and metal rims which made them faster, more durable, and gave them more traction. Questions we need answered: What is this wheel in particular designed to do? Is there any way we could make it work more efficiently at its task? Do we value performance over reliability, or vice versa? Etc. Etc.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7日前

      I think we need to take a bit of a step back and consider what kind of shed we might use to store this wheel…

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7日前

        To answer that, we’ll need to do a deep dive into foundation technology (to determine if it is lacking and needs some improvements) (because we don’t want our wheelshed to sink).

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7日前

      What is this wheel in particular designed to do? Is there any way we could make it work more efficiently at its task? Do we value performance over reliability, or vice versa?

      It works fine. It’s a perfectly good wheel.

      Hey where is Underwaterbob?

      He’s trapped in that Jigsaw room.

      The door is unlocked though?

      Yeah, but there is a wheel in there and UWB won’t leave until he figures out if there is a way to improve it.

      Has any one asked him to?

      No

      Will he get paid to improve it?

      No

      What does the wheel do?

      You roll it out of the way so you can exit the room.

    • Part4@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7日前

      Yeah but neither the romans, or medieval peasants had computers, so why are you on about?

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7日前

    but is it written in 6510 assembly, with cool graphics and catchy music with fast arpeggios?

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6日前

    But my wheel will be much better. I will start from the center with a very simple skeleton and build on top of it as needed. It will be very modular, elegant and easy to understand. It will be my masterpiece.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6日前

    “But is it a just a wheel if we add cloud and AI features to it? Think of all the leveraging of paradigm shifts!” . The trap explodes taking everyone out; even Steve in accounting who had nothing to do with this and wasn’t even in the same building.

    • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      139
      ·
      edit-2
      8日前

      Hello, Rust developer. [My name, etc.] It works fine, and is written in C++. [Rest of challenge is the same.]

      Truly diabolical

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      8日前

      Look, I’m not saying the wheel is wrong. It rotates, but what if two people try to turn the wheel at the same time, in opposite directions?

      What if—instead of risking misuse of the wheel—we have a my_wheel::Wheel, which only one person can rotate at any given time? The multiverse could enforce this safety at compile time by making it impossible for there to exist a universe where two people both think they own the right to rotate the wheel. In fact, it could even make it impossible for me to lend out the wheel to more than one person at a time.

      And, maybe… we could make the wheel even better. Cars rest on top of wheels, sure. But what if I wanted to make a car that rests on top of other cars? If we rotate the super-car’s wheels, we don’t want to make the sub-cars flap around—we want the sub-car wheels to rotate. It would be more future-proof to make a Wheel trait, then to make RubberTyre implement Wheel. Then, if we ever needed to make cars into wheels, we could have them also implement Wheel—but delegate the responsibility of rotating to their own wheels.

      In fact, we should make it into a whole library. Our other projects could need wheels. Mr. Mittens might need them eventually!

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8日前

      Disclaimer: I have never actually written Rust.

      neither have most of the people advocating for (or against) rewriting stuff in Rust lol

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8日前

        I’ll have you know, I’ve started several projects in Rust!

        Only to realize I don’t have time to do unpaid work even if it IS fun.